Hi,

Hm, that's strange.

I tested again today with Core 138 (*32bit*) and once again with current 'next'.

Besides, 'bind 9.11.14' is running here for about two weeks now: no seen problems.

Can it be that this is a problem with 64bit builds only?

On 03.01.2020 22:39, Arne Fitzenreiter wrote:

I had reverted this because it fails on armv5tel. (also on my builder, not only on nightly)

https://nightly.ipfire.org/next/2020-01-02%2016:17:54%20+0000-c846ed16/armv5...

Am 2019-12-23 15:47, schrieb Matthias Fischer:

...

For details see: https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.11.14/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.11.14.html

"Bug Fixes

Fixed a bug that caused named to leak memory on reconfiguration when any GeoIP2 database was in use. [GL #1445]

Fixed several possible race conditions discovered by Thread Sanitizer."

Signed-off-by: Matthias Fischer matthias.fischer@ipfire.org

config/rootfiles/common/bind | 4 ++-- lfs/bind | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/config/rootfiles/common/bind b/config/rootfiles/common/bind index df6bbf4b6..e5435bd02 100644 --- a/config/rootfiles/common/bind +++ b/config/rootfiles/common/bind @@ -272,11 +272,11 @@ usr/lib/libbind9.so.161.0.4 #usr/lib/libdns.la #usr/lib/libdns.so usr/lib/libdns.so.1107 -usr/lib/libdns.so.1107.1.0 +usr/lib/libdns.so.1107.1.1 #usr/lib/libisc.la #usr/lib/libisc.so usr/lib/libisc.so.1104 -usr/lib/libisc.so.1104.0.0 +usr/lib/libisc.so.1104.0.1 #usr/lib/libisccc.la #usr/lib/libisccc.so usr/lib/libisccc.so.161 diff --git a/lfs/bind b/lfs/bind index 6bb23a143..249328843 100644 --- a/lfs/bind +++ b/lfs/bind @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@

include Config

-VER = 9.11.13 +VER = 9.11.14

THISAPP = bind-$(VER) DL_FILE = $(THISAPP).tar.gz @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ objects = $(DL_FILE)

$(DL_FILE) = $(DL_FROM)/$(DL_FILE)

-$(DL_FILE)_MD5 = 17de0d024ab1eac377f1c2854dc25057 +$(DL_FILE)_MD5 = 5aa75bcb6cdad102f151cae4a53f117f

install : $(TARGET)