From: Wolfgang Apolinarski <wolfgang.apolinarski@googlemail.com>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Apache Patches
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 15:19:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b01d33c4a$4aa12e80$dfe38b80$@googlemail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1491 bytes --]
Hi everyone,
regarding the latest apache patches (sorry, I will discuss several patches in one mail):
"disable obsolete and unused ciphers in Apache SSL configuration"
This looks good to me, but why don't we use a standard configuration, like the one that the Mozilla SSL Configuration Generator outputs (or maybe build on that)?
https://mozilla.github.io/server-side-tls/ssl-config-generator/
It could make sense to still support DHE parameters, since they provide PFS - in contrast to the "normal" AES128-GCM-SHA256 parameters. We could pre-generate a 2048 bit DH param and use that, if the user is not re-generating it. This is still a lot better than using the standard Apache DH params. I also discovered while searching for standard DH params that there exist other firewall distributions that do it exactly this way.
"add ECDSA certificate and key files to Apache configuration"
I think that if we add "SSLCertificateFile" twice to the configuration, the first one will just be overwritten. So in this case, the server.crt|key are not used at all.
Another word to the "Require" statements from Apache. As you already noticed, they are ORed, if they are not in a RequireAll|Any|None block. To make this behavior transparent, I would suggest to always use the RequireX block and don't rely on the default (RequireAny->OR), if possible. This is just a note to everyone that updates/creates access control within the Apache configuration.
Best regards,
Wolfgang
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 13:19 Wolfgang Apolinarski [this message]
2017-10-04 15:49 ` Michael Tremer
2017-10-04 19:06 ` Peter Müller
2017-10-04 19:59 ` AW: " Wolfgang Apolinarski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000b01d33c4a$4aa12e80$dfe38b80$@googlemail.com' \
--to=wolfgang.apolinarski@googlemail.com \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox