public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Apolinarski <wolfgang.apolinarski@googlemail.com>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Apache Patches
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 15:19:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b01d33c4a$4aa12e80$dfe38b80$@googlemail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1491 bytes --]

Hi everyone,

regarding the latest apache patches (sorry, I will discuss several patches in one mail):

"disable obsolete and unused ciphers in Apache SSL configuration"
This looks good to me, but why don't we use a standard configuration, like the one that the Mozilla SSL Configuration Generator outputs (or maybe build on that)?
https://mozilla.github.io/server-side-tls/ssl-config-generator/ 

It could make sense to still support DHE parameters, since they provide PFS - in contrast to the "normal" AES128-GCM-SHA256 parameters. We could pre-generate a 2048 bit DH param and use that, if the user is not re-generating it. This is still a lot better than using the standard Apache DH params. I also discovered while searching for standard DH params that there exist other firewall distributions that do it exactly this way.

"add ECDSA certificate and key files to Apache configuration"
I think that if we add "SSLCertificateFile" twice to the configuration, the first one will just be overwritten. So in this case, the server.crt|key are not used at all.

Another word to the "Require" statements from Apache. As you already noticed, they are ORed, if they are not in a RequireAll|Any|None block. To make this behavior transparent, I would suggest to always use the RequireX block and don't rely on the default (RequireAny->OR), if possible. This is just a note to everyone that updates/creates access control within the Apache configuration.

Best regards,
Wolfgang


             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-03 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 13:19 Wolfgang Apolinarski [this message]
2017-10-04 15:49 ` Michael Tremer
2017-10-04 19:06 ` Peter Müller
2017-10-04 19:59   ` AW: " Wolfgang Apolinarski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000b01d33c4a$4aa12e80$dfe38b80$@googlemail.com' \
    --to=wolfgang.apolinarski@googlemail.com \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox