From: Paul Titjen <paul.titjen@ministc.com>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: RE: PFire 2.21
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 21:51:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001201d40f21$d9ec33a0$8dc49ae0$@ministc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8987a19707614c9fd4c4a0c88beb176d60c2d7c0.camel@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5637 bytes --]
Hi Michael,
Sorry no logfiles as I just reloaded 2.21 from the nightly build. So all history in old partitions is lost. If the upgrade from 2.19 120 has been ok with other machines then my experience may have been a one off. I am not overly confident of the BIOS of this machine I have either.
As for 2.21 - running well
CPU usage is as expected. Response is fast no issues. OpenVPN running for road warrior connections and no issues there. If any oddities come up I will report.
The backup issue is tricky. Even if you make it right before the upgrade it would still contain the conf for apache in this case with the php enabled. The upgrade would then remove the php reference but of course if for any reason you needed to restore then it will come back and web GUI would not restart.
Because of your release a few upgrades ago I knew php was going so was relatively quick to spot the fix I needed to do. I had enabled the SSH server before web GUI was lost and could fix.
My lesson is backup before upgrade - and then again after upgrade labelling them with the release #. Maybe it is prudent to mention anything in release notes that might affect web GUI.
Regards,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>
Sent: 28 June 2018 11:41
To: Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)link38.eu>; Paul Titjen <paul.titjen(a)ministc.com>
Cc: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: PFire 2.21
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 23:07 +0200, Peter Müller wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> this is the right place. Testing reports are always welcome. :-)
>
> A crashing grub does not sound so good - especially if a firewall
> machine is physical unreachable and no remote KVM console or similar
> is available.
>
> The 2.12 release was split up in two parts (one includes the new
> kernel, firmware files are in the second) and as far as I am aware,
> both should installed before rebooting.
Yes, you should install both in one go and then reboot. Pakfire should not really allow you to only install one.
> > This may be my machine as I had used a live parted in the past to
> > make a properly useful size var partition.
>
> I did not get this.
Changing the partition layout should not create any problems, because...
> @Core developers: Are we changing partition layout on existing
> installations (enlarge /boot, drop /var)?
... once the system is installed we never change any partition layout and basically don't about it.
@Paul: Do you have any log files or so that can be useful to find out what went wrong here?
> Yes, restoring too old backup files causes trouble. IPFire creates a
> new backup before running a core upgrade, but if this fails, it is
> hard to recover it. So better create a fresh backup before updating to
> 2.21. Should we include this in the release notes?
Pakfire automatically creates one. But people of course have to download that from the system.
> Any observations after running on 2.21 (faster/slower/unstable/...)?
Best,
- -Michael
>
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller
>
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> >
> > Hopefully I am in the right place to report on 2.21
> >
> > Just in case not - a quick summary
> >
> > Moved to testing from stable 120.
> >
> > Pakfire upgraded first to 121 - no reboot suggested.
> >
> > Pakfire upgraded next to 2.21 - This time reboot required.
> >
> >
> >
> > Reboot failed with a broken grub. I could not fix this with the
> > manual grub commands to get ipfire running at all so could not
> > rewrite grub from a running system.
> >
> > This may be my machine as I had used a live parted in the past to
> > make a properly useful size var partition.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bit the bullet and downloaded nightly build of 2.21 and reinstalled
> > a clean ipfire.
> >
> > So far so good.
> >
> >
> >
> > Only one comment about restoring previous settings from a backup.
> >
> > My backup was old and from a time when php was supported. After
> > restoring the backup a surprise was in store the next time apache
> > web interface was restarted. Apache failed as there is a reference
> > in the conf files from backup to load php so extension.
> >
> > Commenting out the line fixes it of course. Just thought I would
> > mention that restoring backups from a version prior to the latest
> > may have issues as features start to get expired.
> >
> >
> >
> > By the way I really admire the stuff you do and a donation is en-route.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=PYHD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <012c01d40e59$94d51de0$be7f59a0$@ministc.com>
2018-06-27 21:07 ` Peter Müller
2018-06-28 10:41 ` Michael Tremer
2018-06-28 20:51 ` Paul Titjen [this message]
2018-06-29 17:26 ` IPFire 2.21 test report Peter Müller
2018-06-29 20:55 ` Peter Müller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001201d40f21$d9ec33a0$8dc49ae0$@ministc.com' \
--to=paul.titjen@ministc.com \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox