Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26

Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 624 bytes --]

Hi,

that these were sent in one patchset is not an issue (as I said). The
other things that I commented inline though are. Are you going to do
anything about them?

I think there is no point to look at any new patches that include the
same mistakes.

-Michael

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:28 +0000, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this are all single patches. I had problems to send patches to  the
> list.
> I use the "git send-email --annotate -3" command for my  last 3
> changes. 
> This was new for me, that there are "connectet"
> 
> The first with db6 are not in the pach list. How i can correct this?
> 
> Marcel

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

AW: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26

[Marcel Lorenz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1686 bytes --]

Hi, 

sorry, i use Outlook to read this mails.  First i not see all your comments in your answer.
I move this mail to my roundcube test system and i found the comments.  :-)

The db6 package cannont replace the db4. Some componsts will fails build with 
only the new db6 header files. I try the hard way to patch this packages and i giving up. To many and endless problems.

This package is primary for the later postfix 3 integration.
Some other packages will found automatically the db6 header in the db6 subfolder. (Apache 2.4, Postfix 3  i seen)

I will make a new and better patch. This was my first try for the maillinglist...  ;-)

Ps. Please tell me when i write nonsense in english... 

Marcel


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Development [mailto:development-bounces(a)lists.ipfire.org] Im Auftrag von Michael Tremer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 19:03
An: Marcel Lorenz <m.lorenz(a)ml-systec.de>
Cc: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26

Hi,

that these were sent in one patchset is not an issue (as I said). The other things that I commented inline though are. Are you going to do anything about them?

I think there is no point to look at any new patches that include the same mistakes.

-Michael

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:28 +0000, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this are all single patches. I had problems to send patches to  the 
> list.
> I use the "git send-email --annotate -3" command for my  last 3 
> changes.
> This was new for me, that there are "connectet"
> 
> The first with db6 are not in the pach list. How i can correct this?
> 
> Marcel

Re: AW: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1972 bytes --]

On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 07:58 +0100, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> sorry, i use Outlook to read this mails.  First i not see all your
> comments in your answer.
> I move this mail to my roundcube test system and i found the
> comments.  :-)
> 
> The db6 package cannont replace the db4. Some componsts will fails
> build with 
> only the new db6 header files. I try the hard way to patch this
> packages and i giving up. To many and endless problems.
> 
> This package is primary for the later postfix 3 integration.
> Some other packages will found automatically the db6 header in the
> db6 subfolder. (Apache 2.4, Postfix 3  i seen)
> 
> I will make a new and better patch. This was my first try for the
> maillinglist...  ;-)
> 
> Ps. Please tell me when i write nonsense in english... 

You don't.

Please include this information (that it won't replace db4, and that
this is for postfix) in the patch, too.

Best,
-Michael

> 
> Marcel
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Development [mailto:development-bounces(a)lists.ipfire.org] Im
> Auftrag von Michael Tremer
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 19:03
> An: Marcel Lorenz <m.lorenz(a)ml-systec.de>
> Cc: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26
> 
> Hi,
> 
> that these were sent in one patchset is not an issue (as I said). The
> other things that I commented inline though are. Are you going to do
> anything about them?
> 
> I think there is no point to look at any new patches that include the
> same mistakes.
> 
> -Michael
> 
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:28 +0000, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this are all single patches. I had problems to send patches
> > to  the 
> > list.
> > I use the "git send-email --annotate -3" command for my  last 3 
> > changes.
> > This was new for me, that there are "connectet"
> > 
> > The first with db6 are not in the pach list. How i can correct
> > this?
> > 
> > Marcel
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26

[ummeegge]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2946 bytes --]

Hi all,
have tried to build the newer version of BerkeleyDB only and without a DB4 compat a while ago and a complete buildthrough needed patches for OpenLDAP, PHP (have patched it for DB6 in the updated version PHP-5.6.17 will deliver it in the next days) and squidGuard but i haven´t collected good testing results with this basics at this time but you can find in here --> http://git.ipfire.org/?p=people/ummeegge/ipfire-2.x.git;a=commit;h=749c518093e887f614a91d73fdefcb64f14aa952 the needed patches for a DB6 only environment.
Nevertheless a lot of software still uses BDB in version 5 or 4. Like PHP, the sources need´s then to be patched to be compatible with a BerkeleyDB-6 only installation, so a compat version 4 might be a good idea in my opinion.

Greetings,

Erik

Am 17.02.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>:

> On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 07:58 +0100, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> sorry, i use Outlook to read this mails.  First i not see all your
>> comments in your answer.
>> I move this mail to my roundcube test system and i found the
>> comments.  :-)
>> 
>> The db6 package cannont replace the db4. Some componsts will fails
>> build with
>> only the new db6 header files. I try the hard way to patch this
>> packages and i giving up. To many and endless problems.
>> 
>> This package is primary for the later postfix 3 integration.
>> Some other packages will found automatically the db6 header in the
>> db6 subfolder. (Apache 2.4, Postfix 3  i seen)
>> 
>> I will make a new and better patch. This was my first try for the
>> maillinglist...  ;-)
>> 
>> Ps. Please tell me when i write nonsense in english...
> 
> You don't.
> 
> Please include this information (that it won't replace db4, and that
> this is for postfix) in the patch, too.
> 
> Best,
> -Michael
> 
>> 
>> Marcel
>> 
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Development [mailto:development-bounces(a)lists.ipfire.org] Im
>> Auftrag von Michael Tremer
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 19:03
>> An: Marcel Lorenz <m.lorenz(a)ml-systec.de>
>> Cc: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
>> Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> that these were sent in one patchset is not an issue (as I said). The
>> other things that I commented inline though are. Are you going to do
>> anything about them?
>> 
>> I think there is no point to look at any new patches that include the
>> same mistakes.
>> 
>> -Michael
>> 
>> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:28 +0000, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> this are all single patches. I had problems to send patches
>>> to  the
>>> list.
>>> I use the "git send-email --annotate -3" command for my  last 3
>>> changes.
>>> This was new for me, that there are "connectet"
>>> 
>>> The first with db6 are not in the pach list. How i can correct
>>> this?
>>> 
>>> Marcel


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 842 bytes --]