I don’t quite understand why we can’t ship this. > On 23 Jun 2022, at 11:30, Peter Müller wrote: > > Hello Stefan, > > thank you for submitting this. > > Does this patch urgently need to go into Core Update 169? While there is still an > issue left to solve with the update, I would rather abstain from packing any patch > that now comes up into it as well... > > Apart from that: > > Reviewed-by: Peter Müller > > Thanks, and best regards, > Peter Müller > > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Schantl >> --- >> config/suricata/ruleset-sources | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/config/suricata/ruleset-sources b/config/suricata/ruleset-sources >> index 1d2c6e98b..592cbedf0 100644 >> --- a/config/suricata/ruleset-sources >> +++ b/config/suricata/ruleset-sources >> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ our %Providers = ( >> website => "https://www.snort.org", >> tr_string => "registered user rules", >> requires_subscription => "True", >> - dl_url => "https://www.snort.org/rules/snortrules-snapshot-29190.tar.gz?oinkcode=", >> + dl_url => "https://www.snort.org/rules/snortrules-snapshot-29200.tar.gz?oinkcode=", >> dl_type => "archive", >> }, >> >> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ our %Providers = ( >> website => "https://www.snort.org", >> tr_string => "subscripted user rules", >> requires_subscription => "True", >> - dl_url => "https://www.snort.org/rules/snortrules-snapshot-29190.tar.gz?oinkcode=", >> + dl_url => "https://www.snort.org/rules/snortrules-snapshot-29200.tar.gz?oinkcode=", >> dl_type => "archive", >> }, >>