From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Fischer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] BUG 11786 - squid: Remove setting for filter processes the number of Squid processes Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:05:27 +0100 Message-ID: <00f23b28-ba4d-0e6e-7520-5c62dc6ebffc@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: <2e74c926-a425-1d32-b727-60b410c52986@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9093044778200638468==" List-Id: --===============9093044778200638468== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 15.12.2018 14:24, Matthias Fischer wrote: > On 30.10.2018 17:05, Michael Tremer wrote: >> On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 15:37 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>> On 30.10.2018 15:03, Michael Tremer wrote: >>> > Hey, >=20 > Hi, >=20 >> ... >> A queue size of 64 seems sensible to me because that is probably what the>= > average tabloid newspaper page has. Maybe it should be 16 * N or so... >> ... > I tested this quite a while now. If I set 'queue-size' to 64, there will > be occasional warnings: >=20 > ... > 2018/12/15 14:10:59 kid1| comm_udp_sendto FD 8, (family=3D2) 127.0.0.1:53: > (1) Operation not permitted > 2018/12/15 14:10:59 kid1| idnsSendQuery FD 8: sendto: (1) Operation not > permitted > ... >=20 > With a value of '128' these warnings do not occur. >=20 > Running on Duo Box. >=20 > Corresponding 'squid.conf' line, latest 'squid 4.4', 32bit: >=20 > ... > url_rewrite_children 2 startup=3D2 idle=3D2 queue-size=3D128 > ... FYI: Apparently two specific DNS block rules which blocked direct DNS requests were responsible for these error messages. After deactivating these rules, squid runs fine with "queue-size=3D64" Best, Matthias --===============9093044778200638468==--