Re: Core Update 137 (testing) report

[Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1680 bytes --]

Hello,

Thanks for the report. This sounds really positive.

Did anybody else find anything?

-Michael

> On 29 Oct 2019, at 17:54, peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org wrote:
> 
> Hello list,
> 
> Core Update 137 (testing, see https://blog.ipfire.org/post/ipfire-2-23-core-update-137-is-available-for-testing)
> is running here for about 24 hours without any unexpected behaviour so far.
> 
> I can confirm new connections are now established immediately, without having
> a delay until the application or operating system decides do open up a new
> socket. Thereof, enabling Suricata does not have any noticeable negative side
> effect (except for some performance things), which I consider to be quite good.
> 
> While CPU IRQ usage deceased a bit after installing the Core Update, RAM
> consumption is now more adaptive (see WebUI graph attached) than before. It
> looks like some application has learned to free unused memory... :-)
> 
> The following parts of IPFire seem to work correctly:
> - DDNS
> - OpenVPN (RW connections only)
> - IPsec (N2N connections only)
> - Squid proxy (including authentication and upstream proxy)
> - Guardian
> - Tor (acting as a relay, no fresh installation, I am aware of bug #12220)
> - Quality of Service
> 
> Output of "uname -a" for reference purposes:
>> [root(a)maverick ~]# uname -a
>> Linux maverick 4.14.150-ipfire #1 SMP Tue Oct 22 17:07:54 GMT 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3150 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> 
> I look forward to an official release of this Core Update.
> 
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller
> <ipfire_core_update_137_testing_ram_consumption_per_week.png>