public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Migrating from ntp to chrony - challenge
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 17:23:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08779C92-880B-41A9-A247-866D90B5C5CC@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15235E57-D318-41EF-AD45-DA63AD839790@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3196 bytes --]

Hello,

> On 17 Jun 2021, at 16:26, Jon Murphy <jcmurphy26(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I’d like to challenge!
> 
> (This post was recently moved from the IPFire Community to the Development Mailing List)
> I saw this in the agenda from last week:
> 
> <80392284118cf74d1a1176de8762f1da431444d3_2_517x148.png>
> Screen Shot 2021-06-16 at 11.42.49 AM
> 1738×500 51.1 KB
> 
> 
> I thought chrony was more for desktops & laptops. Devices that power down and might have a big time jump. And NTP was more for servers or devices that run full-time.

Yeah, I suppose that was true. Chrony used to be a client only, so it could not share its time with the network. That functionality was however added and it can also read from local time sources now.

I would say that they can be used interchangeably today. Some obscure features might be missing from chrony, but it should absolutely cover our use case.

> The current NTP in IPFire can be easily changed from polling (one per hour / once per day) to non-polling by making a few simple changes to a config file:
> 
> disable
>  monitor
> 
> restrict
>  default nomodify notrap nopeer
> 
> restrict 127.0.0.1
> server  $NTP_ADDR_1
>  prefer
> 
> server  $NTP_ADDR_2
> server  127.127.1.0
> fudge   127.127.1.0 stratum 10
> driftfile
>  /etc/ntp/drift
> 
> $NTP_ADDR_1 and _2 are the Primary NTP server and Secondary NTP server from the https://ipfire:444/cgi-bin/time.cgi webgui page.
> 
> And by changing the https://ipfire:444/cgi-bin/time.cgi Synchronization to Manually

This would have been useful, but the change to chrony was proposed and I would like that because ntp was full of CVEs recently whereas chrony has a way more modern code base which hopefully is well reviewed and does not introduce anything bad.

> Anyway, my thought is to make some changes to the current NTP service instead of implementing something new…

So far this is an item that Peter put on his to-do list, but I am not sure if anything was done about it, yet.

-Michael

> 
> Jon
> 
> ---------------------------
> 
> TL;DR
> 
> 
> When NTP is configured differently (Manually polling enabled) it will “correct” on it own:
> 
> Oct  6 21:40:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is 0.000 PPM at Tue Oct  6 21:35:43 CDT 2020
> Oct  6 23:20:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is -18.986 PPM at Tue Oct  6 23:16:05 CDT 2020
> Oct  7 00:20:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is -140.863 PPM at Wed Oct  7 00:16:04 CDT 2020
> Oct  7 01:20:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is -210.676 PPM at Wed Oct  7 01:16:04 CDT 2020
> Oct  7 02:20:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is -347.531 PPM at Wed Oct  7 02:16:04 CDT 2020
> Oct  7 03:20:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is -407.147 PPM at Wed Oct  7 03:16:04 CDT 2020
> Oct  7 04:20:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is -414.606 PPM at Wed Oct  7 04:16:04 CDT 2020
> Oct  7 05:20:01 ipfire ntpdate: Updated drift file.  Drift is -414.826 PPM at Wed Oct  7 05:16:04 CDT 2020
> 
> More into:
> 
> https://community.ipfire.org/t/odd-ntp-offset-issues-continued/492
> 
> 


       reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <15235E57-D318-41EF-AD45-DA63AD839790@gmail.com>
2021-06-17 16:23 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
2021-07-06 13:08 ` Arne Fitzenreiter
2021-07-06 16:42   ` Tapani Tarvainen
     [not found] <3C7671DC-C106-4FDE-9194-557DD46A857C@gmail.com>
2021-06-17 21:41 ` Adolf Belka
2021-06-18  5:12   ` Tapani Tarvainen
2021-06-19  6:30     ` Peter Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08779C92-880B-41A9-A247-866D90B5C5CC@ipfire.org \
    --to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox