public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Last call for Core Update 167 (was: Re: Core Updates 166 and 167)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:49:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <09479B5E-8AAD-4C42-8FC7-BAC2A857F024@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68cf898c-4861-6e7e-276c-9bb596861508@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1985 bytes --]

Hello,

I would recommend creating a patch for this.

And since we need to test this a little bit before we release it, I would schedule it for c168.

-Michael

> On 11 Apr 2022, at 07:21, Bernhard Bitsch <bbitsch(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Hope I'm not too late with this.
> Since a week I have running the latest APU firmware ( v4.16.02 ) on my system.
> Found no problems until now, but an enhancement. The AMD PSP CCP is now found as entropy source. So the boot process is faster.
> 
> This may be useful for many IPFire users. Is it possible to include in CU 167?
> 
> Regards,
> Bernhard
> 
> Am 02.04.2022 um 09:42 schrieb Peter Müller:
>> Hello development folks,
>> being responsible for upcoming Core Update 167, I would like to close this
>> update roughly at the beginning of next week. This is because it contains
>> several security-relevant updates (such as Apache, Bind [might need another one?],
>> zlib [again], OpenSSH, and so on) which I think should be available to our
>> userbase as soon as possible.
>> To have CVE-2022-1015 and CVE-2022-1016 covered, I will submit a patch for
>> an updated kernel later this day, since we have enough space to ship one as
>> the linux-firmware changes were reverted (see 8a4780de645a5b3ab42054eaf022c57d6849ae9a).
>> Looking at Patchwork, it would be great if we could clarify the status of
>> these patches and patch series, and whether they should go into Core Update
>> 167 or not:
>> - https://patchwork.ipfire.org/project/ipfire/list/?series=2684
>> - https://patchwork.ipfire.org/project/ipfire/list/?series=2698
>> - https://patchwork.ipfire.org/project/ipfire/patch/66e4978d-6ba4-6c14-329c-6f7ae99ed4b2(a)ipfire.org/
>> If there are any patches sitting around in your local/private repositories
>> you want to have in Core Update 167, kindly post them. As always, drop me a
>> line in case of questions or comments.
>> Thanks, and best regards,
>> Peter Müller


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <a19176a0-e95e-b58b-aa0e-35ce80ffa056@ipfire.org>
2022-04-02  7:42 ` Peter Müller
2022-04-02 11:00   ` Michael Tremer
2022-04-02 11:30     ` Peter Müller
2022-04-02 14:16       ` Michael Tremer
2022-04-04  9:21     ` Bernhard Bitsch
2022-04-02 14:54   ` Stefan Schantl
2022-04-11  6:21   ` Bernhard Bitsch
2022-04-11  7:49     ` Michael Tremer [this message]
2022-04-11 19:14     ` Rob Brewer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=09479B5E-8AAD-4C42-8FC7-BAC2A857F024@ipfire.org \
    --to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox