From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gfkzv0mdzz2xjY for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [IPv6:2001:678:b28::25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1 raw public key) server-digest SHA384 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "YR2" (not verified)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gfkzq5Hxgz2xHk for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gfkzn3CxBz6qV; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:20:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003ed25519; t=1781608805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RoC3QB/goc5sEIqSrqFz7iT7gD7tJQiCWWlP7AbzpaQ=; b=infVhKIsu7l9tYNNdhl42oIJdUwg5BkP95SUvMEsPIkxUIxfp7tHSYyuE26Fki7rka8FrC PIqioavg3g46nXAA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1781608805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RoC3QB/goc5sEIqSrqFz7iT7gD7tJQiCWWlP7AbzpaQ=; b=PVCZWSF1mZCD5IVczZuNB3BuNA2atgg+hMHuen7EuVKi42UfgBZWJojgwG4v9775Ecx9JX HhtPSehbtEaNbjw4UxXDIjKPTPc2tBdSmLhv4vv2aPyjR/fOHutN8YZ97n90OOhj0IWfeo +D58yAFAwreU7cAq0aAPMLj8/+e6WQtwtM8LXMb+7cXwmYfaNf4s2s7rN/qXsyuFSnr8Jx UdZBtu1y5oj6Ifgy4WTsKAVCW9irBFME/7BzTZzpCue3gEEuib7uAqO+A3wgfHzintA3uF ZD87jnf6Q0d/o4bqHC7bMe/UEEBEfxXfStRTjx5N/X60vvBCu/Wh0q+M+Yco2w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: list List-Id: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: Sender: Mail-Followup-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Updating perl 5.36.0 => 5.42.2 - some questions (was: Re: perl-Net-DNS: Not updated) From: Michael Tremer In-Reply-To: <60287726-6a52-4c3d-af92-917f62d52759@ipfire.org> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:20:04 +0100 Cc: development@lists.ipfire.org, "IPFire: Belka, Adolf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0B8676F0-27B2-4DE2-BE12-301D2F827E4D@ipfire.org> References: <2dd775e8-e645-43f2-8219-e79198e666e3@ipfire.org> <1D3FCBD1-16E5-450B-88A0-B27B1F337EDB@ipfire.org> <56142892-a026-4f3f-b446-f05153f87490@ipfire.org> <60287726-6a52-4c3d-af92-917f62d52759@ipfire.org> To: Matthias Fischer Hello Matthias, Yes, this is a bug update because there are plenty of modules built = after the main package. The best way would be to update them one by one - i.e. commit them one = by one. But since this is a lot, I would be happy to listen to any other = proposals. Best, -Michael > On 14 Jun 2026, at 22:04, Matthias Fischer = wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > On 12.06.2026 13:19, Adolf Belka wrote: >> ... >> Feel free to do so but maybe you should also look at updating the = perl package itself. >> ... >=20 > I did. But I'm not quite sure what to do next and need a hint. >=20 > After "a few" rootfile-adjustments I got a build based on 'next' with > 'perl 5.42.2' that is building without any errors. No seen problems. >=20 > Adjusting the rootfile for the new perl version was a bit...extensive, > but I think I managed it. Build is running without any errors. >=20 > But there are about 70 rootfiles from 'common' to 'packages' who = thought > they were all alone now and wanted to come along. They all contained = the > perl version string '5.36.0', which now had to be changed to 5.42.2. >=20 > I think I need to push these files together with the actual perl = update. > This will take some place for an update... Since this is my first perl > update I was a bit surprised how many files were affected. >=20 > Would this be ok? Updating perl leads to about ~70 files that need to = be > updated too and pushed because of changed rootfiles? >=20 > Best > Matthias >=20 >=20