public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pakfire: remove dup. code + seperate ui/logic
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 20:43:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0CE7316B-6F21-47A1-9ACA-AFA7FC521371@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220728112136.30218-1-robin.roevens@disroot.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4051 bytes --]

Hello,

Yay. *Throws confetti*

> On 28 Jul 2022, at 12:21, Robin Roevens <robin.roevens(a)disroot.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> As promised a revision of this patchset by the end of July.
> Also fixing bug #12868, both in patch 01 (installed: yes/no output) and 
> patch 06 (don't trow error on valid '--no-color' option).
> 
> This is quite a large patchset on delicate code which was discussed upon
> previous submission, but that was almost half a year ago. So I will try
> to link references to discussions on my previous submission where
> appropriate to refresh some memories :-).
> 
> What was changed since last submission; implementing/fixing 
> Michael's remarks/concerns:
> - Patch 01: Added translations as requested here: 
>            https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012782.html
> - Patch 02: New patch translating WUI header/footer text
> - Patch 03: (previously patch 02) was not changed
> - Patch 04: (previously patch 03) replaced a forgotten fetchfile/move
>            combo by new getmetafile function
> - Previous patch 04 was removed as the function coreupdate_available turned out no
>            longer used. 
>            See: https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012884.html
> - Patch 05: Replaced seq shell command by perl seq-method, consistent
>            use of 'Core-Update' as requested here: 
>            https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012787.html
> - Patch 06: Added exitcode to pakfire list as requested here: 
>            https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012787.html
> 	    Also exit with error when an unknown parameter is passed to
>            pakfire list
>            Added a small fix (in my opinion): log termination of pakfire 
>            inside END block
> - Patch 07: Removed function coreupdate_available as it was concluded
>            that it was no longer needed (see again: 
>            https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012884.html)
> 	    Added meaningfull status exit code as remarked here:
> 	    https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012788.html
>            Split previous patch 07 pakfire.cgi changes in new patch 08:
> - Patch 08: New patch, previously part of patch 07
>            Fixed localization as pointed out here:
>            https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012788.html
> - Patch 09: (previously patch 08) Split previous patch 08 into patch 09
>            adding 'getmetadata' function and 'pakfire info' and patch 10
>            implementing the new 'getmetadata' in service.cgi.
>            Show clean warning message when no packages are found
>            with requested pakfire list filter
> - Patch 10: (previously part of patch 08) Removed hardcoded exclusions
>            in services.cgi as pointed out here:
>            https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012789.html
> Previous patch 09 was dropped from this patchset as there turned out to
> be major problems with it and should be rethinked as pointed out here:
> https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2022-March/012856.html             
> 	    
> 
> I think I have tested this all throughly but as these are quite interusive
> changes to the pakfire core workings; Please do not trust my testing and test 
> these patches yourselves during review. I would not want to carry the
> responibilities of breaking pakfire alone :-)

Indeed. We will need to test this *very* thoroughly. Not because I don’t trust you, but because we won’t be able to patch user’s systems if this thing properly breaks. So all give it a very good test so that we can all sleep better again.

However, I am not panicking about this, since the code looked good and clean. Great job!

-Michael

> Regards
> Robin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke
> inhoud door MailScanner en lijkt schoon te zijn.
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-28 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-28 11:21 Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] pakfire: Refactor dblist seperating UI and logic Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] pakfire: Translate WUI header/footer text Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] pakfire: Replace duplicate code with dblist functioncall Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] pakfire: Replace dbgetlist duplicate code Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] pakfire: Optimize upgradecore function Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] pakfire: Add list upgrade functionality Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] pakfire: Refactor status seperating UI and logic Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] pakfire: Replace status duplicate code Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] pakfire: Add getmetadata function Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] pakfire: Replace getmetadata duplicate code Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] pakfire: remove dup. code + seperate ui/logic Peter Müller
2022-07-29 20:11   ` Robin Roevens
2022-07-28 19:43 ` Michael Tremer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0CE7316B-6F21-47A1-9ACA-AFA7FC521371@ipfire.org \
    --to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox