public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: ldconfig messages - "path given more than once" + "can't stat file..."
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 13:09:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10888A1C-C7FC-42AE-90CC-949C71587A02@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6746d609-95e3-4be5-a767-e41a0c3db8c1@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4052 bytes --]

Hi,

> On 14 May 2020, at 13:01, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 14.05.2020 13:38, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> Oh, yes, they show up with -v. But I wouldn’t worry about them...
> 
> Oh my...: "...I cannot reproduce..."!
> 
> YMMD! I first thought I had built a crippled ISO or something else!
> 
> Went through the logs. Found nothing. All ok. Puh!
> 
> But you're right - as far as I could find any informations on this, it
> seems to be a rather "cosmetic" issue. Going on for at least 4 years
> now. It nagged me.
> 
> So I HAD to fix this: "This town is too small for the two of us,
> stranger!" ;-)
> 
> Should I send the patch anyway?


Yeah, why not? I wouldn’t mind it.

But please make sure you test it first :)

-Michael

> 
> Best,
> Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On 14 May 2020, at 12:36, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> first, I installed Core 144 / 64bit, built on a new 64bit Devel machine.
>>> I already integrated an upgrade in this install (squid 4.11 with latest
>>> patch).
>>> 
>>> Install went ok.
>>> 
>>> I restored my (main) backup - OK.
>>> 
>>> Installed addons through pakfire - OK.
>>> 
>>> Restored addon backups - OK.
>>> 
>>> I upgraded some other programs (tmux / monit / privoxy / vnstat / squid
>>> graphs), which were compiled on the new 64bit devel.
>>> 
>>> ["Devel64" = Linux Devel64 4.15.0-99-generic #100-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 22
>>> 20:32:56 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux, running Ubuntu 18.04.4
>>> LTS]
>>> 
>>> All in all: no seen problems, everything is running.
>>> 
>>> Then I compiled and installed an update for 'knot' (2.9.4).
>>> 
>>> Just to be careful, I manually ran 'ldconfig -v' after upgrading.
>>> 
>>> And then I suddenly saw these messages the first time. With the new
>>> 'glibc' patch they're gone now - and the lib list is exactly the same.
>>> 
>>> As I see it, the whole system is running without any problems. Only
>>> 'ldconfig' did complain and then I started to search for the reason.
>>> 
>>> And yes, I was a bit stunned, too.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>>> 
>>> On 14.05.2020 12:38, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I am confused now and cannot reproduce this on any of my systems.
>>>> 
>>>> Where did this happen?
>>>> 
>>>> -Michael
>>>> 
>>>>> On 14 May 2020, at 08:54, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> => Patched
>>>>> 
>>>>> => Works
>>>>> 
>>>>> => Messages about paths "given more than once" and "No such file or
>>>>> directory" are gone.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 'ldconfig' is working 'without seen problems' on Core 144 / x86_64.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Patch wanted? ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 14.05.2020 01:40, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>>>>>> According to the discussion in the link cited below I built an attached
>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Would this work?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 14.05.2020 01:18, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>> In the meantime I've found this discussion:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://trac.clfs.org/ticket/1098
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Could it be that this behaviour is triggered by 'glibc'!?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 14.05.2020 00:38, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> on a fresh Core 144 / x86_64 install, running without any seen problems,
>>>>>>>> I get these "messages":
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Path `/lib64' given more than once
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Can't stat /libx32: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib64' given more than once
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Can't stat /usr/libx32: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> when I run 'ldconfig -v'.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is new to me - I'm searching, but haven't found the reason yet. And
>>>>>>>> I'd like to know...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-14 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13 22:38 Matthias Fischer
2020-05-13 23:18 ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-13 23:40   ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14  7:54     ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14 10:38       ` Michael Tremer
2020-05-14 11:36         ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14 11:38           ` Michael Tremer
2020-05-14 12:01             ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14 12:09               ` Michael Tremer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10888A1C-C7FC-42AE-90CC-949C71587A02@ipfire.org \
    --to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox