From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: ldconfig messages - "path given more than once" + "can't stat file..."
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 13:09:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10888A1C-C7FC-42AE-90CC-949C71587A02@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6746d609-95e3-4be5-a767-e41a0c3db8c1@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4052 bytes --]
Hi,
> On 14 May 2020, at 13:01, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 14.05.2020 13:38, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> Oh, yes, they show up with -v. But I wouldn’t worry about them...
>
> Oh my...: "...I cannot reproduce..."!
>
> YMMD! I first thought I had built a crippled ISO or something else!
>
> Went through the logs. Found nothing. All ok. Puh!
>
> But you're right - as far as I could find any informations on this, it
> seems to be a rather "cosmetic" issue. Going on for at least 4 years
> now. It nagged me.
>
> So I HAD to fix this: "This town is too small for the two of us,
> stranger!" ;-)
>
> Should I send the patch anyway?
Yeah, why not? I wouldn’t mind it.
But please make sure you test it first :)
-Michael
>
> Best,
> Matthias
>
>>
>>> On 14 May 2020, at 12:36, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> first, I installed Core 144 / 64bit, built on a new 64bit Devel machine.
>>> I already integrated an upgrade in this install (squid 4.11 with latest
>>> patch).
>>>
>>> Install went ok.
>>>
>>> I restored my (main) backup - OK.
>>>
>>> Installed addons through pakfire - OK.
>>>
>>> Restored addon backups - OK.
>>>
>>> I upgraded some other programs (tmux / monit / privoxy / vnstat / squid
>>> graphs), which were compiled on the new 64bit devel.
>>>
>>> ["Devel64" = Linux Devel64 4.15.0-99-generic #100-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 22
>>> 20:32:56 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux, running Ubuntu 18.04.4
>>> LTS]
>>>
>>> All in all: no seen problems, everything is running.
>>>
>>> Then I compiled and installed an update for 'knot' (2.9.4).
>>>
>>> Just to be careful, I manually ran 'ldconfig -v' after upgrading.
>>>
>>> And then I suddenly saw these messages the first time. With the new
>>> 'glibc' patch they're gone now - and the lib list is exactly the same.
>>>
>>> As I see it, the whole system is running without any problems. Only
>>> 'ldconfig' did complain and then I started to search for the reason.
>>>
>>> And yes, I was a bit stunned, too.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> On 14.05.2020 12:38, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am confused now and cannot reproduce this on any of my systems.
>>>>
>>>> Where did this happen?
>>>>
>>>> -Michael
>>>>
>>>>> On 14 May 2020, at 08:54, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> => Patched
>>>>>
>>>>> => Works
>>>>>
>>>>> => Messages about paths "given more than once" and "No such file or
>>>>> directory" are gone.
>>>>>
>>>>> 'ldconfig' is working 'without seen problems' on Core 144 / x86_64.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch wanted? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 14.05.2020 01:40, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>>>>>> According to the discussion in the link cited below I built an attached
>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would this work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14.05.2020 01:18, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>> In the meantime I've found this discussion:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://trac.clfs.org/ticket/1098
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could it be that this behaviour is triggered by 'glibc'!?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 14.05.2020 00:38, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> on a fresh Core 144 / x86_64 install, running without any seen problems,
>>>>>>>> I get these "messages":
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Path `/lib64' given more than once
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Can't stat /libx32: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib64' given more than once
>>>>>>>> ldconfig: Can't stat /usr/libx32: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> when I run 'ldconfig -v'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is new to me - I'm searching, but haven't found the reason yet. And
>>>>>>>> I'd like to know...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-14 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 22:38 Matthias Fischer
2020-05-13 23:18 ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-13 23:40 ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14 7:54 ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14 10:38 ` Michael Tremer
2020-05-14 11:36 ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14 11:38 ` Michael Tremer
2020-05-14 12:01 ` Matthias Fischer
2020-05-14 12:09 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10888A1C-C7FC-42AE-90CC-949C71587A02@ipfire.org \
--to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox