Hi, > On 25 Jun 2020, at 16:28, Matthias Fischer wrote: > > Hi, > > On 25.06.2020 10:54, Michael Tremer wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> On 20 Jun 2020, at 16:09, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> rsync 3.2.0 is out and I just had time... > > In fact, I'm at 3.2.1. See below. > >>> In order to use the new xxhash checksum support and zstd compression, >>> the corresponding kernel modules would need to be activated. Do we want >>> or need these? >> >> You won’t need kernel modules for this. You simply need the relevant libraries. > > Ok. I wasn't sure. I found some 'zstd's in the rootfiles and thought we > would need these. > >> I have packaged those for IPFire 3 and they are easy to build and have no further dependencies. So I would recommend to at least add zstd. > > I am at it. > >> https://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-3.x.git;a=blob;f=rsync/rsync.nm;h=528dcfc0a377bc770a45a8f88af00079eb26dc93;hb=b40cdb8c182d8b4aa05c6e23cc67118c4aa4853c >> https://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-3.x.git;a=blob;f=zstd/zstd.nm;h=e5afd342b9ad2ae0c0f394116ef2dfddea670413;hb=8bcac5c8cda49b91fe68bef64c3ad975b80a43ca > > Thats exactly what I needed - thanks - I'll take a look. > >> >>> >>> For now, I disabled both with these configure options: >>> >>> ... >>> --disable-xxhash \ >>> --disable-zstd >>> ... >>> >>> Do we want (would someone use) the new 'rsync-ssl'-script? On a firewall!? >> >> I tried to find out what this is useful for. It doesn’t harm us and calls openssl. So I would just leave it in there. > > Ok. > > Please note: > > 'rsync 3.2.1' just came out. I'm testing - and working on 'zstd 1.4.5' > (weekend, I think). > > If you want, we could skip 3.2.0 => no need to merge this patch. > > I could mark 3.2.0 as 'superseded' in patchwork and we'll go straight to > 3.2.1. Yes, absolutely do that. There is no point in merging 3.2.0 if 3.2.1 is already under works. Best, -Michael > > Opinions? > > Best, > Matthias