public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: peter.mueller@ipfire.org
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: IPFire Core 135 testing
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:41:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12d0af2c-6159-9504-7f09-496d482558eb@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ECF66D53-69E9-40FE-909A-9CBBA48689D6@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2321 bytes --]

Hello Michael, hello *,

I can confirm the testing update looks good so far.

These parts are working as expexcted:
- DDNS
- IPsec (N2N connections only)
- Squid proxy (including upstream proxy)
- OpenVPN (RW connections only)
- Suricata (see below)

However, I observed OpenVPN RW connection throughput decreased to
~ 350 kB/sec - 1.1 MB/sec if Suricata is enabled and filtering
traffic on RED interface. Otherwise, throughput is usually ~ 2.0 MB/sec
(= 16 MBit/sec), which is not that fast on my testing machine using
a 100 MBit/sec internet downlink, but the remote system or some
general OpenVPN performance issues seem to be the bottleneck here.

This issue probably appeared before upgrading to Core 135, and
I am still debugging why this is (Suricata configuration is identical
to a productive firewall instance with better OpenVPN throughput).

Further, DNS resolution sometimes fails, but that issue has been
around here for quite a while. If there is enough time left, I
will send in patches for always allowing DNS traffic to root servers
and enabling hyperlocal (see RFC 7706).

Running kernel is as follows:
> [root(a)maverick ~]# uname -a
> Linux maverick 4.14.138-ipfire #1 SMP Sat Aug 10 00:53:30 GMT 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3150 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Speaking about CPU vulnerabilities, I notice changes in kernel
status output for Spectre v1 (CVE-2017-5753):
> [root(a)maverick ~]# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/*
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/l1tf:Not affected
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mds:Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT disabled
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/meltdown:Mitigation: PTI
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_store_bypass:Not affected
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v1:Mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2:Mitigation: Full generic retpoline, IBPB: conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP: disabled, RSB filling

As far as I can recall, "usercopy/swapgs barriers" was not present
before. No comments on hardware security landscape in general.

Things look good so far, thanks to everyone who worked on this. :-)

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-30 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <H000006e0051eec0.1567017214.mail.at4b.net@MHS>
2019-08-30 13:31 ` Michael Tremer
2019-08-30 17:41   ` peter.mueller [this message]
2019-08-30 22:35     ` Kienker, Fred

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12d0af2c-6159-9504-7f09-496d482558eb@ipfire.org \
    --to=peter.mueller@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox