From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: [Development] Core Update 57 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:06:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1330113983.14108.8.camel@hughes.tremer.info> In-Reply-To: <4F478D00.3080406@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4837318016443433861==" List-Id: --===============4837318016443433861== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I can not confirm that. Do you have some more detail? Logs, graphs? Michael On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 14:13 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote: > Since I've updated to Coe 57 my IPFire needs more memory and I can't see > for what. Any ideas what I may check? > > - Daniel > > > > Am 21.02.2012 20:31, schrieb WhyTea: > > Installed Core 57 no problems with installing and no problems after > > reboot. > > > > Am 21.02.2012 18:41, schrieb Michael Tremer: > >> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 16:53 +0000, Arne Fitzenreiter wrote: > >>> The vpn update was moved to core58 because the update has still bugs > >>> (not deleting routes). Libpng also comes with core58 because Michael > >>> and > >>> i has forgotten it to pull it to the master branch before build. > >> Oops. I just checked in some new bug reports regarding the update of > >> Strongswan. No security fixes, but feature enhancements. > >> https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037 > >> > >> > >> Core Update 57 is up and running since a couple of days now and I have > >> found no regressions. I also don't expect to find any. > >> > >> Michael > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Development mailing list > >> Development(a)lists.ipfire.org > >> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development(a)lists.ipfire.org > http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/development --===============4837318016443433861==--