Re: [Development] Fwd: samba tuning

[Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1538 bytes --]

Hi,

I guess nobody ever checked them out.

For at least sendfile: I believe that the first kernels that came with
IPFire 2.1 did not have an implementation of sendfile.

I additionally found, that the buffers are set to approx. 8kb which
could also be increased. Supposedly, everyone has got enough of RAM.

Please open a bug to track this feature and prepare a patch.

Michael

On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 10:08 +0100, WhyTea wrote:
> Hi again!
> 
> I've tested it again. Now with 1GBit/s
> 
> without these parameters the write speed is about 23 MByte/s
> withe these parameters the write speed is about 80 MByte/s
> 
> So I ask again, is there any reason why we don't use them?
> 
> - Daniel
> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- 
>                           Betreff: 
> samba tuning
>                             Datum: 
> Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:34:17 +0100
>                               Von: 
> Daniel Weismüller
> <whytea(a)ipfire.org>
>                        Antwort an: 
> whytea(a)ipfire.org
>                                An: 
> development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> is there any reason why ipfire don't use the following parameters with 
> samba?
> 
> use sendfile = 1
> aio read size = 1
> aio write size = 1
> 
> I've tested them and it brings my samba-performance from 8,9 MB/s up to 
> 9,2 MB/s (using 100Mbit/s fullduplex)
> 
> - Daniel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/development