From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: [Development] Fwd: samba tuning Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:55:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1332413735.16918.102.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info> In-Reply-To: <4F6B03EF.705@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6050068080817284375==" List-Id: --===============6050068080817284375== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 11:50 +0100, Christian Schmidt wrote: > Refering to http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html > > the better and correct syntax is > > use sendfile = yes > aio read size = 16384 > aio write size = 16384 > > since sendfile can result in some problems with older clients I´am not > quite sure about that That's a good point. The documentation says there a issues with clients like Win 9x. Nobody does use that anymore. For those who still do, the option could be configurable. One still needs to decide what the default setting is. I would vote for "enabled". > The buffers and tcp options can be changed by using the socket option in > the gui, the detault settings are taken quite conservative True. Would this be a problem to change that? I don't think we should expect any regressions by that. Michael --===============6050068080817284375==--