public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Updated Updxlrator and other changes
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:33:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359387196.12466.41.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <t2a0hgjsokii024t8i0ky01t.1359382116060@email.android.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10661 bytes --]

No, I did not merge this and I am not going to.

As I am pointed out, I have a lot of other things to do and Stefan
wanted to review your changes. You should contact him, if there is a
problem why this has not made any progress, yet.

Michael

On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jörn-Ingo Weigert wrote:
> Great that you merged it for 2.13 :)
> 
> There is are one minor glitch for the status icon (showing parts of another icon cause of missing div) in the "anstehende uploads" table and the delete icon.
> For this i will send a small patch later this day.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
>  nightshift
> 
> Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org> schrieb:
> 
> >In case this should be shipped with IPFire 2.13, this has to me fully
> >merged by today!
> >
> >We are just finished with all the things, that we had to do for RC1,
> >which is about to be released this week. After that, we cannot take any
> >changes that are anything else than bug fixes.
> >
> >Michael
> >
> >On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 12:21 +0100, Jörn-Ingo Weigert wrote:
> >> Any update on this for merging or test results / bugs?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Kind regards,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> nightshift
> >> 
> >> 2013/1/9 Jörn-Ingo Weigert <jiweigert(a)gmail.com>
> >>         That would be nice when it could be integrated in a 2.11
> >>         Core66 ;)
> >>         Before that it will be great when the developers could check
> >>         their UI-Addon-Interfaces.
> >>         
> >>         
> >>         Before the my patches all browsers where regardless of the
> >>         used DOCTYPE in a quirks-mode of xhtml.
> >>         So with these patches the xhtml-strict now really get into
> >>         work, with the side-effect that maybe some Addon-pages
> >>         are not well working as designed (maybe links not clickable,
> >>         etc).
> >>         
> >>         
> >>         These errors are mostly caused by misplacing Tags,
> >>         UPPERCASE-type of it or using depricated or misused attributes
> >>         or Tags like <FONT> which are really depricated in XHTML 1.0.
> >>         Those kind of errors are easy to find with the W3C-Validator
> >>         and more easy to fix. 
> >>         
> >>         
> >>         For the ui of updxl I just needed 1 hour to find and fix those
> >>         general errors, and a "little" bit more  (a lie but sound
> >>         good ;) )  to optimise it for an more CSS-based layout.
> >>         If the general errors are fixed that would be enough.
> >>         
> >>         
> >>         Did anyone test it and have some results if the changes I made
> >>         work or work not on their machines or have any degressions
> >>         elsewhere?
> >>         
> >>         
> >>         Kind regards,
> >>         
> >>         
> >>         nightshift
> >>         
> >>         2013/1/5 Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>
> >>                 Hello,
> >>                 
> >>                 thank you very much for the patches you sent in. I had
> >>                 a look at them
> >>                 and they look fine (did not read through all the perl
> >>                 code).
> >>                 
> >>                 Patches 0005 is a duplicate of 0004.
> >>                 
> >>                 Who is now going to merge them to the git repository?
> >>                 I am running out
> >>                 of time to do that.
> >>                 
> >>                 I reckon the changes won't make it to IPFire 2.13,
> >>                 which is done by now.
> >>                 
> >>                 Michael
> >>                 
> >>                 On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 09:24 +0100, Jörn-Ingo Weigert
> >>                 wrote:
> >>                 > Hi Michael,
> >>                 >
> >>                 > 2012/12/23 Michael Tremer
> >>                 <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>
> >>                 >         Hi Jörn,
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         could you please provide patch files against
> >>                 the current
> >>                 >         development
> >>                 >         tree, so we can review the changes you made
> >>                 more easily.
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Done, I'm not so familar with git and RCS in
> >>                 general, so take it easy
> >>                 > and the files attached.
> >>                 > don't know if git added the extra giffiles so added
> >>                 it too. put them
> >>                 > into html/html/images/updbooster dir.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         Well, the WUI is not conform to any HTML
> >>                 standard, because too
> >>                 >         many
> >>                 >         people have put their code into it without
> >>                 agreeing on a
> >>                 >         coding style.
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Well, I oriented me on the existing XHTML-Doctype in
> >>                 the current
> >>                 > header.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         I personally consider this as a full-time
> >>                 job to fix all
> >>                 >         problem that
> >>                 >         there are and so, I don't want to put more
> >>                 time than necessary
> >>                 >         into it.
> >>                 >         Developing a new WUI from scratch is more
> >>                 important to me.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 > I agree with you, but hoping that coming versions of
> >>                 browsers will be
> >>                 > lazy as now in interpreting
> >>                 > not correct formed (x)html should not the right way.
> >>                 Better to point
> >>                 > to the browser vendors then on our own code. ;)
> >>                 > And its not much work (Hust) to test it with online
> >>                 validators.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         > 1. apache:
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         > Modified /etc/httpd/conf/loadmodules.conf
> >>                 - enable
> >>                 >         mod_deflate for
> >>                 >         > compression the output files (except
> >>                 graphics) if browser
> >>                 >         supports it.
> >>                 >         >
> >>                 Modified /etc/httpd/conf/vhosts.d/ipfire-interface-ssl.conf
> >>                 >         - enabling
> >>                 >         > compression for whole SSL-Web interface
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         Yeah, we can accept that one. Please send
> >>                 the patch.
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Great :)
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         > 2. Theme "ipfire" & "maniac":
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         >    ....
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         > These changes let perform google chrome
> >>                 like a charm
> >>                 >         rendering the
> >>                 >         > pages within ~15 secs like other browsers
> >>                 (tested with IE9,
> >>                 >         Opera,
> >>                 >         > Firefox in actual versions)
> >>                 >         > instead of waiting for minutes ...
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         In case that does not break anything with
> >>                 older browsers, send
> >>                 >         a patch
> >>                 >         as well.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 > I didn't test it with IE <=7, or NNavigator nor
> >>                 MOSAIC ... well let's
> >>                 > see.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         > 3. Web-UI in general and addons which use
> >>                 the "age"-function
> >>                 >         from
> >>                 >         > general-functions
> >>                 >         >
> >>                 >         >
> >>                 >         >  - modified age function to show the time
> >>                 translated, in
> >>                 >         single and
> >>                 >         > plural terms, but only the parts, which
> >>                 make sense.
> >>                 >         >    Example instead of showing: 0d 0h 47m
> >>                 15s, it will show
> >>                 >         now: 47
> >>                 >         > Minutes, 15sec. in connection time
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         I don't think that it makes any sense to
> >>                 print "minutes"
> >>                 >         instead of "m"
> >>                 >         because there is not enough space to do so.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         I agree that it makes sense to omit "0d" and
> >>                 "0h".
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Well, it prints out only the first part in long
> >>                 form, all followed
> >>                 > will be shortened
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Examples
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Old: 1d 2h 3m 4s
> >>                 > New: 1 Day, 2 Hr, 3 Min, 4 Sec
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Old: 0d 0h 1m 2s
> >>                 > New: 1 Minute, 2 Sec.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         Yes there is, because those files have been
> >>                 changed recently.
> >>                 >
> >>                 > I see.
> >>                 >
> >>                 >         -Michael
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Hope, this work now..
> >>                 >
> >>                 > Kind regards,
> >>                 >
> >>                 > nightshift
> >>                 
> >>                 > _______________________________________________
> >>                 > Development mailing list
> >>                 > Development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> >>                 > http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> >>                 
> >>         
> >>         
> >> 
> >> 
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-28 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28 14:13 Jörn-Ingo Weigert
2013-01-28 15:33 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
     [not found] <CAAiW7AemvOF5y_pxnSsmy98mJmjOveGfSK2jCZhven1bh=bqwg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-28 13:11 ` Michael Tremer
     [not found] <CAAiW7AdEsKJB0AKM+x8zBy5Vf5HFEkSstO_hrSMbO8nkX7NrgA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-05 12:37 ` Michael Tremer
     [not found] <CAAiW7Af9ifdV4xW3NonEq9QDkj=-wHgiP43NN3eTqwD5mQdqwA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-23 12:43 ` Michael Tremer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359387196.12466.41.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info \
    --to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox