On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 13:13 +0200, Larsen wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:02:15 +0200, Michael Tremer  
> <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> >> I do know that some have JS deactivated and don´t like it, but in this
> >> case there is nothing lost.
> >
> > If someone disables JS they will already have issues with other parts of
> > the web user interface and of course most of the "web 2.0".
> >
> >> Is there anything else wrong with using JS?
> >
> > Not in general. I just find it a rather complex solution for a simple
> > problem. The plain HTML approach would be much better and work for those
> > who disable JS, too.
> 
> But then you loose CSS, don´t you?

What do you mean by loose? That should be changed then, yes.

The final HTML code would look something like this:

<div id="logo">
	<a href="http://www.ipfire.org">
		<img src="logo.png" ...>
	</a>
</div>

The CSS properties should be changed that the background image is
removed and the content is centered. The final result should like the
same in the end.

> And if someone has actually disabled JS, they will notice other problems  
> as you mentioned before, so it´s unlikely they will even noticed that they  
> cannot click on the IPFire logo to get to the homepage.
> 
> 
> Lars