From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: IPFire 2.17 - Core Update 91 release schedule
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:46:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434015960.25208.221.camel@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6A691F9C-E1A7-480E-8D1E-12A37DD544C8@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2075 bytes --]
Hello,
just follow this guide:
http://wiki.ipfire.org/en/configuration/ipfire/pakfire/testing
-Michael
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:44 +0200, Jan Lentfer wrote:
> Hi, could you shortly describe (possibly once more) how can follow the testing branch instead of the stable branch? TIA Jan
>
> Von meinem iPad gesendet
>
> > Am 11.06.2015 um 10:51 schrieb Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just wanted to update you quickly about the upcoming Core Update 91
> > release plan.
> >
> > There will be a new OpenSSL release at some time today (Thursday) which
> > fixes several security vulnerabilities in this library. We do not know
> > much about the severity of those vulnerabilities, yet, but we will
> > release a new Core Update any ways.
> >
> > The changes that have been pushed into the next branch will be released
> > as well with an exception of Python. The Python package won't build on
> > some systems and due to lack of time to debug this properly the Python
> > update has been postponed.
> >
> > As soon as the OpenSSL update is released we will start the build. We
> > expect this to be late at night (as it has been in the past) and
> > therefore the will be a build available Friday morning/noon European
> > time. The ARM build will take much longer to complete though.
> >
> > We will push that build to the testing tree so that as many people can
> > help testing as possibly can.
> >
> > If everything goes well we intend to release the final update 24 hours
> > after that - which will be Saturday some time after mid day.
> >
> > Best,
> > -Michael
> >
> > P.S. I was asked to send a short release plan for Core Updates on this
> > list because it is not so easy to find out what the current status is
> > sometimes. I would like your feedback about if this is a good idea and
> > if this is helping. I am hoping that it is helping us to engage more
> > testers into the testing procedure of new Core Updates and let you plan
> > some time for doing that.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6A691F9C-E1A7-480E-8D1E-12A37DD544C8@web.de>
2015-06-11 9:46 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
2015-06-11 13:55 ` Aw: " Bernhard Bitsch
2015-06-11 21:37 ` perl code cleanup (was: IPFire 2.17 - Core Update 91 release schedule) Michael Tremer
2015-06-12 10:31 ` Aw: " Bernhard Bitsch
2015-06-12 16:10 IPFire 2.17 - Core Update 91 release schedule Paul Simmons
[not found] <CAFHX57dDn27REQhoqBysqwZKCmTB72fxXKFtaFHPcqTW-wtqOg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-11 11:52 ` Michael Tremer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-11 8:51 Michael Tremer
2015-06-11 15:55 ` Rod Rodolico
2015-06-11 20:39 ` Michael Tremer
2015-06-12 15:15 ` Michael Tremer
2015-06-13 13:20 ` Arne Fitzenreiter
2015-06-12 20:42 ` Arne Fitzenreiter
2015-06-13 5:51 ` Stefan Schantl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434015960.25208.221.camel@ipfire.org \
--to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox