Hello Tom,

any news so far? Is everything still working?

If so I would like to merge this patch for Core Update 95.

Best,
-Michael

On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 18:07 +0100, Michael Tremer wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 12:25 -0400, Tom Rymes wrote:
> > On 10/03/2015 5:31 PM, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > > If an IPsec VPN connections is not established, there are
> > > rare cases when packets are supposed to be sent through
> > > that said tunnel and incorrectly handled.
> > 
> > Michael, et. al.:
> > 
> > I just posted a comment on the bug before I realized that e-mail
> > would 
> > be more appropriate.
> > 
> > My apologies for not being up to speed on this, but can you hold my
> > hand 
> > on implementing this? I am simply not confident enough to apply
> > these
> > changes without a better understanding of what I am doing.
> 
> You got this already applied (at least the bare essence of that). I
> think we should wait for someone else to confirm that this is not
> crashing anything :)
> 
> Since I emailed this patch I am still wondering if we should not
> limit
> this rule to the RED interface. We didn't do that when we tried all
> this on one of your machines (
> https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10908#c16). It is an
> easier
> solution, but I am wondering if that does not have any side
> -effects...
> 
> @Timo: You should use the Reviewed-by: tag then.
> 
> Best,
> -Michael
> 
> > 
> > Thank you,
> >