From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Merge Window Closing Announcement for Core Update 127 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:14:19 +0000 Message-ID: <14489638-338E-49C8-994D-5678496FB6F6@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: <5d24f84f-e12d-cb00-0847-b2077e84165a@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5823059030950795265==" List-Id: --===============5823059030950795265== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > On 13 Jan 2019, at 10:04, Matthias Fischer = wrote: >=20 > On 10.01.2019 15:22, Michael Tremer wrote: >> Hello guys, >=20 > Hi, >=20 >> Upon request, I would like to announce that on Saturday, 12th Jan, we are = going to branch Core Update 127. >>=20 >> This means that we no longer accept any patches that introduce any new fea= tures and only accept patches that fix any bugs introduced. Nothing new here,= you all know how this works :) >>=20 >> This announcement is just coming now so that you all know this. It is a bi= t short notice this time, but I hope I will be better with this next time rou= nd. In the past some patches have been submitted after the merge window close= d and had to be deferred to the next Core Update to the frustration of the su= bmitters. Therefore, we now try this and hope that we can make the process be= tter for everyone who is contributing! >>=20 >> We have an update with many new features here. Please help testing as soon= as the first build is available. >> ... >=20 > Thanks for the reminder, but regarding this Core update, one question is > bothering me: >=20 > Did anyone had the chance to test 'squid 4.5' - especially along with > this commit > (https://git.ipfire.org/?p=3Dipfire-2.x.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3Deedca6e36c1131ce= 5542da5ccbfbb5667648c024 > =3D> "squid: Run as many redirectors as we have CPU cores") - in a > productive environment? >=20 > During my first tests, I got occasional warnings like "idnsSendQuery FD > 8: sendto: (1) Operation not permitted" or "WARNING: All 2/2 redirector > processes are busy" in squid 'cache.log' and I'd like to clarify > possible mistakes in advance. >=20 > By now, I'm running the untuned parameters from current 'next' and these > errors haven't appeared for some time now. Furthermore, 'testing tree' > exists, ( ;-) ) but did anyone had a chance to try this? I sent squid thousands of requests with ab (Apache Benchmark) and that worked= fine with only one redirector. Best, -Michael >=20 > Best, > Matthias --===============5823059030950795265==--