Re: With new Patches 030-041 'dnsmasq' 2.75 won't compile anymore

[Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1528 bytes --]

Hi,

I do read the list. Simon uploaded a patch so that it builds.

I am not sure though if we should have a testing version like that in
the distribution at this stage. Is there a chance that it will become
stable until C97 will be released?

I see what issue you are trying to tackle here, but Simon considers
this code as a bit wonkey (from what I saw in the commit messages). Can
you maybe consult with him?

Best,
-Michael

On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 20:53 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05.01.2016 00:00, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > please add the dnsmasq list and let Simon know.
> 
> Did that and made a small step forward - 'dnsmasq' is compiling now,
> but...
> 
> I don't know if you're reading the dnsmasq list - the only solution
> until now was
> to compile *with* dhcp-support by removing...
> 
> ***SNIP***
> "-e 's|#define HAVE_DHCP|//#define HAVE_DHCP|g' \"
> ***SNAP***
> 
> Only warning during build:
> 
> ***SNIP***
> isc.c: In function 'dhcp_lease_new':
> isc.c:40:3: warning: ignoring return value of 'asprintf', declared
> with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
>     asprintf(&lease->fqdn, "%s.%s", hostname, daemon->domain_suffix);
>     ^
> ***SNAP***
> 
> I hope this will make no big difference for testing, since as far as
> I know,
> 'dnsmasq' has dhcp-server disabled by default. To enable it you have
> to
> uncomment dhcp-related lines in '/etc/dnsmasq.conf'(e.g.), which
> doesn't exist.
> But this was the only chance by now.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Best,
> Matthias

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]