From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:10:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455736216.12368.1.camel@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003f01d16950$8c477b10$a4d67130$@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1972 bytes --]
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 07:58 +0100, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, i use Outlook to read this mails. First i not see all your
> comments in your answer.
> I move this mail to my roundcube test system and i found the
> comments. :-)
>
> The db6 package cannont replace the db4. Some componsts will fails
> build with
> only the new db6 header files. I try the hard way to patch this
> packages and i giving up. To many and endless problems.
>
> This package is primary for the later postfix 3 integration.
> Some other packages will found automatically the db6 header in the
> db6 subfolder. (Apache 2.4, Postfix 3 i seen)
>
> I will make a new and better patch. This was my first try for the
> maillinglist... ;-)
>
> Ps. Please tell me when i write nonsense in english...
You don't.
Please include this information (that it won't replace db4, and that
this is for postfix) in the patch, too.
Best,
-Michael
>
> Marcel
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Development [mailto:development-bounces(a)lists.ipfire.org] Im
> Auftrag von Michael Tremer
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 19:03
> An: Marcel Lorenz <m.lorenz(a)ml-systec.de>
> Cc: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26
>
> Hi,
>
> that these were sent in one patchset is not an issue (as I said). The
> other things that I commented inline though are. Are you going to do
> anything about them?
>
> I think there is no point to look at any new patches that include the
> same mistakes.
>
> -Michael
>
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:28 +0000, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this are all single patches. I had problems to send patches
> > to the
> > list.
> > I use the "git send-email --annotate -3" command for my last 3
> > changes.
> > This was new for me, that there are "connectet"
> >
> > The first with db6 are not in the pach list. How i can correct
> > this?
> >
> > Marcel
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1b19758ecdfd463bbdc65bd7fb85cef8@srv01.kits.local>
2016-02-16 18:03 ` Michael Tremer
2016-02-17 6:58 ` AW: " Marcel Lorenz
2016-02-17 19:10 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
2016-02-18 16:24 ` ummeegge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455736216.12368.1.camel@ipfire.org \
--to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox