On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 07:58 +0100, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> sorry, i use Outlook to read this mails.  First i not see all your
> comments in your answer.
> I move this mail to my roundcube test system and i found the
> comments.  :-)
> 
> The db6 package cannont replace the db4. Some componsts will fails
> build with 
> only the new db6 header files. I try the hard way to patch this
> packages and i giving up. To many and endless problems.
> 
> This package is primary for the later postfix 3 integration.
> Some other packages will found automatically the db6 header in the
> db6 subfolder. (Apache 2.4, Postfix 3  i seen)
> 
> I will make a new and better patch. This was my first try for the
> maillinglist...  ;-)
> 
> Ps. Please tell me when i write nonsense in english... 

You don't.

Please include this information (that it won't replace db4, and that
this is for postfix) in the patch, too.

Best,
-Michael

> 
> Marcel
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Development [mailto:development-bounces(a)lists.ipfire.org] Im
> Auftrag von Michael Tremer
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 19:03
> An: Marcel Lorenz <m.lorenz(a)ml-systec.de>
> Cc: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26
> 
> Hi,
> 
> that these were sent in one patchset is not an issue (as I said). The
> other things that I commented inline though are. Are you going to do
> anything about them?
> 
> I think there is no point to look at any new patches that include the
> same mistakes.
> 
> -Michael
> 
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:28 +0000, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this are all single patches. I had problems to send patches
> > to  the 
> > list.
> > I use the "git send-email --annotate -3" command for my  last 3 
> > changes.
> > This was new for me, that there are "connectet"
> > 
> > The first with db6 are not in the pach list. How i can correct
> > this?
> > 
> > Marcel
>