From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:10:16 -0800
Message-ID: <1455736216.12368.1.camel@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <003f01d16950$8c477b10$a4d67130$@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1176114228510509024=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============1176114228510509024==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 07:58 +0100, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> sorry, i use Outlook to read this mails.  First i not see all your
> comments in your answer.
> I move this mail to my roundcube test system and i found the
> comments.  :-)
> 
> The db6 package cannont replace the db4. Some componsts will fails
> build with 
> only the new db6 header files. I try the hard way to patch this
> packages and i giving up. To many and endless problems.
> 
> This package is primary for the later postfix 3 integration.
> Some other packages will found automatically the db6 header in the
> db6 subfolder. (Apache 2.4, Postfix 3  i seen)
> 
> I will make a new and better patch. This was my first try for the
> maillinglist...  ;-)
> 
> Ps. Please tell me when i write nonsense in english... 

You don't.

Please include this information (that it won't replace db4, and that
this is for postfix) in the patch, too.

Best,
-Michael

> 
> Marcel
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Development [mailto:development-bounces(a)lists.ipfire.org] Im
> Auftrag von Michael Tremer
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 19:03
> An: Marcel Lorenz <m.lorenz(a)ml-systec.de>
> Cc: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH 1/3] New package: berkeley db 6.1.26
> 
> Hi,
> 
> that these were sent in one patchset is not an issue (as I said). The
> other things that I commented inline though are. Are you going to do
> anything about them?
> 
> I think there is no point to look at any new patches that include the
> same mistakes.
> 
> -Michael
> 
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:28 +0000, Marcel Lorenz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this are all single patches. I had problems to send patches
> > to  the 
> > list.
> > I use the "git send-email --annotate -3" command for my  last 3 
> > changes.
> > This was new for me, that there are "connectet"
> > 
> > The first with db6 are not in the pach list. How i can correct
> > this?
> > 
> > Marcel
> 

--===============1176114228510509024==
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
MIME-Version: 1.0
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--===============1176114228510509024==--