Hi,

On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 15:39 -0600, Paul Simmons wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 20:22 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 28.02.2016 21:19, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > > 
> > > I merged this patch and the one after.
> > > 
> > > Please give this version a good test as it is a pre-release
> > > version.
> > Its running here.
> > 
> > > 
> > > You can maintain a branch where you integrate all new changes,
> > > but
> > > I
> > > think it is not required to send every single one to the mailing
> > > list.
> > > It creates a bit of noise and I think that unfortunately nobody
> > > is
> > > testing every single one any ways. Which is sad.
> > Yep. ;-)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Can we have maybe one aggregated patch after every release of a
> > > Core
> > > Update? So we always have the latest version of dnsmasq in the
> > > updates?
> > I'll do that. If not otherwise wanted, I'll send the current -
> > patched -
> > version after every Core Update.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Matthias
> 
> @list:
> 
> I hope to have an opportunity to test RealSoonNow via an alternate
> boot
> scheme on current hardware.
> 
> Do you want me to test the i586 or the x86_64?

Ideally both :) But as we do not release the 64 bit builds at the
moment, i586 is preferred.

Best,
-Michael

> 
> Paul