From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: 2.76test10 with latest patches (001-004) Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:00:39 +0000 Message-ID: <1457092839.6973.37.camel@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2816711862858584480==" List-Id: --===============2816711862858584480== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, it is indeed a question of testing. We intend to release it soon, but unfortunately there is only little man power to work on an other architecture. So contribution is appreciated. Best, -Michael On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 14:06 -0500, Kienker, Fred wrote: > Is there any chance the x86_64 version will ever be released? If it > is a  > question of testing, I will volunteer to test it. > > Best regards, > Fred Kienker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Tremer [mailto:michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org]  > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:49 PM > To: Paul Simmons; development(a)lists.ipfire.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: 2.76test10 with latest patches (001- > 004) > > Hi, > > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 15:39 -0600, Paul Simmons wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 20:22 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 28.02.2016 21:19, Michael Tremer wrote: > > > > > > > > I merged this patch and the one after. > > > > > > > > Please give this version a good test as it is a pre-release  > > > > version. > > > Its running here. > > > > > > > > > > > You can maintain a branch where you integrate all new changes, > > > > but  > > > > > I think it is not required to send every single one to the > > > > mailing  > > > > > list. > > > > It creates a bit of noise and I think that unfortunately nobody > > > > is  > > > > > testing every single one any ways. Which is sad. > > > Yep. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > Can we have maybe one aggregated patch after every release of > > > > a  > > > > Core Update? So we always have the latest version of dnsmasq > > > > in  > > > > the updates? > > > I'll do that. If not otherwise wanted, I'll send the current -  > > > patched - version after every Core Update. > > > > > > Best, > > > Matthias > > > > @list: > > > > I hope to have an opportunity to test RealSoonNow via an alternate  > > boot scheme on current hardware. > > > > Do you want me to test the i586 or the x86_64? > > Ideally both :) But as we do not release the 64 bit builds at the  > moment, i586 is preferred. > > Best, > -Michael > > > > > Paul > --===============2816711862858584480== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" MIME-Version: 1.0 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcgdjEKCmlRSWNCQUFC Q2dBR0JRSlcyWGpuQUFvSkVJQjU4UDl2a0FrSExlSVFBSlkrRkswTEovK0lGQjMxUUw4VTMwQWwK SlQrN3RXd2E4UzhFTk1GRFdRQUpRNERMMU13Tnd2d3AzMWtkYW9KNmJqV0JxZzlRM2lYQnFjSDdV enM4VTRPaAo4UkF6eTZkanc2S0hrY2QwZ1FxdGVqRE9odk5HWndxSFJJOHlsT1hZd0NyM1oyZDlB bnRIaU1YS3QxbVlNK2pOCm4wbmtiVm13czdMdkFvcnVDd1hMdVdpL1BXNC9qSWgxbFhGZFg3UzlJ SEUvRzFnMWZSVUs4NXcrVmpSbDZDRzkKcVJ3UUozYXgxcmtIa0hQMUt1YlRYZkFCMWVXQ2JQbzlp QXZxUXAveXRzdVpvMDFMYWZxTkNnUnJ1MEk1ckg3WApsMWc2V0doSWdJOGZYSFZMclhQRnh2L3NF NzVEREJrSFNoZXB1a0NFdzdENkNqRDhVSmhtNWZOdFN5aWhpanhOCjF5N0xUcEozdi96NEhZcmp6 Zi9Gc29PUVFsbW85eEszbnhjTnZMUXpYeWRtWWQrMnU2bkQ4L3U2UVg1WFJZdmgKY3Z6clI3bFhy VWNneGFrNHczRVRGY1JkVDYyMjZsQUVyaE5oTnFjcDVyKzVqMGFLVzZzZGxqTU5sTHVCV0w2cAo2 amZOZHdUTU9haWhkRVhQdmFqUVRwUW8vRGJjNzlNVWV3NTJ4d3hsaE9Zck9Id3YwMUNtQkZDN28x T0pEYXFXCjh6b2JkcTBUTUptKzlXYXhQYWFBY0V0cS9FZ2FpZmJUUzd0c0FhSEZYa2dnVXR0ZXg5 ZVlqT0pLdWtmbUhOQngKdmFZNFVzaEl5eFlZMHNqYU9UWUZLbnZLL3Nyd2Vadlp0R0t5SWRxckFR L2wwV3JNcDNmZzRhbk9VUGxMZDg2YQp4QmZIWkNmU0hMMTViNjlDeUlsbwo9WG9nNwotLS0tLUVO RCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0K --===============2816711862858584480==--