* Re: [PATCH] Firewall: Add Services SSMTP and submission
2016-07-26 12:06 ` Michael Tremer
@ 2016-07-26 12:36 ` Alexander Marx
2016-07-27 19:59 ` R. W. Rodolico
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Marx @ 2016-07-26 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1022 bytes --]
Changed that.
I think there's no need to update existing installations.
The people who are already using the system for years, would have
already added the service if needed.
Alex
Am 26.07.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hi,
>
> since when is Submission using UDP (and spelled all in capitals)?
>
> I guess it is intentional that existing systems are not updated?
>
> Best,
> -Michael
>
> On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 14:14 +0200, Alexander Marx wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Marx <alexander.marx(a)ipfire.org>
>> ---
>> config/fwhosts/customservices | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/config/fwhosts/customservices b/config/fwhosts/customservices
>> index 9b25a72..bf3a690 100644
>> --- a/config/fwhosts/customservices
>> +++ b/config/fwhosts/customservices
>> @@ -32,3 +32,6 @@
>> 34,DNS (TCP),53,TCP,,0
>> 19,FTPS data,989,TCP,BLANK,0
>> 5,SMTP,25,TCP,BLANK,0
>> +35,SUBMISSION (TCP),587,TCP,BLANK,0
>> +36,SUBMISSION (UDP),587,UDP,BLANK,0
>> +37,SSMTP,465,TCP,BLANK,0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Firewall: Add Services SSMTP and submission
2016-07-26 12:06 ` Michael Tremer
2016-07-26 12:36 ` Alexander Marx
@ 2016-07-27 19:59 ` R. W. Rodolico
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: R. W. Rodolico @ 2016-07-27 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2195 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I determined it used udp by grep'ing "submission" from /etc/services.
Granted, I have absolutely NO idea why submission would ever use udp
but, at least on my Debian Wheezy workstation, it shows up as 587 for
both tcp and udp. That is why I included it in the original request.
I did not look up the rfc (RFC4409,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4409.txt) or maybe RCH6409
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6409). My bad. Going to those I see it
has absolutely no mention of udp in them. However, I did a quick
search and found it mentioned other places for tcp and udp.
I did find mention of udp at stackoverflow, saying "In theory SMTP can
be handled by either TCP, UDP, or some 3rd party protocol."
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16809214/is-smtp-based-on-tcp-or-udp
)
and linking to various RFC's.
However, I know of no servers currently that use anything other than
tcp for submission. I may be wrong.
I think we'd be safe to include or not include udp. It is "Legally"
viable, but I'm not aware of any actual use.
Rod
On 07/26/2016 07:06 AM, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since when is Submission using UDP (and spelled all in capitals)?
>
> I guess it is intentional that existing systems are not updated?
>
> Best, -Michael
>
> On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 14:14 +0200, Alexander Marx wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Marx <alexander.marx(a)ipfire.org> ---
>> config/fwhosts/customservices | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3
>> insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/config/fwhosts/customservices
>> b/config/fwhosts/customservices index 9b25a72..bf3a690 100644 ---
>> a/config/fwhosts/customservices +++
>> b/config/fwhosts/customservices @@ -32,3 +32,6 @@ 34,DNS
>> (TCP),53,TCP,,0 19,FTPS data,989,TCP,BLANK,0
>> 5,SMTP,25,TCP,BLANK,0 +35,SUBMISSION (TCP),587,TCP,BLANK,0
>> +36,SUBMISSION (UDP),587,UDP,BLANK,0 +37,SSMTP,465,TCP,BLANK,0
- --
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
http://www.dailydata.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAleZEokACgkQuVY3UpYMlTT8pQCeNkb++FXhUhVfrqp/+KI5RwGm
52UAnRkSdVrBYzZMiJkm0VOtclKwmcwy
=345V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread