From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: htpasswd: message digest algorithm (was: Re: Question concerning commit #eef9b2529c3cab522dac4f4bcfa1a0075376514e)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:48:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476568139.9950.54.camel@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94772ee3-4db0-4752-80c2-7c0a80f7b25f@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1324 bytes --]
Hi,
On Sat, 2016-10-15 at 08:16 +0000, IT Superhack wrote:
> Hello Michael,
> hello Development-List (in CC),
>
> sorry for rehashing the issue: At 2016-10-06 I summarized
> my findings about htpasswd and its lack of bcrypt. Unfortunately,
> the bcrypt message digest algorithm is only available in
> the htpasswd version provided by the Apache Web Server (version
> 2.4.4 or later).
>
> Since it uses SHA *without any salt*, it seems to be more
> secure in my point of view to use the MD5 method instead, where
> a salt is used.
I agree with this. Although not optimal, this is probably the option with better
security (assuming to BF against rainbow table).
I added some more details to the commit message:
http://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-2.x.git;a=commitdiff;h=96473f525dcec4115b9bab0b305ff5b92194b134
> Thereof I kindly ask you to revert the commit
> #eef9b2529c3cab522dac4f4bcfa1a0075376514e, where these changes
> were introduced. I know the developers are busy because of
> Core Update 106, and it can always happen that something slips
> through the fingers. :-)
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Timmothy Wilson
Thanks for making me reconsider this.
However, I would be happy to receive any patches that add support for bcrypt to
*actually* fix this.
Best,
-Michael
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-15 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-15 8:16 IT Superhack
2016-10-15 21:48 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
2016-10-23 14:21 ` htpasswd: message digest algorithm IT Superhack
2016-10-23 18:10 ` Michael Tremer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476568139.9950.54.camel@ipfire.org \
--to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox