What else is it using for threading right now?

On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 16:44 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> unbound 1.6.0 - with reverted commit - is running here since a few hours
> without seen problems so far - we'll see.
> 
> One question, being curious:
> 
> Could it make sense to compile 'unbound' using '--with-pthreads' for
> threading support?
> 
> I got the following in '_build.ipfire.log' right now:
> 
> ...
> checking for the pthreads library -lpthreads... no
> checking whether pthreads work without any flags... no
> checking whether pthreads work with -Kthread... no
> checking whether pthreads work with -kthread... no
> checking for the pthreads library -llthread... no
> checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... yes
> checking for joinable pthread attribute... PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE
> checking if more special flags are required for pthreads... no
> checking for PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT... yes
> checking for pthread_spinlock_t... yes
> checking for pthread_rwlock_t... yes
> checking if -pthread unused during linking... no
> ...
> 
> In this regard, I read
> https://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_optimise.html, but I'm not
> so skilled in programming to judge whether this would lead to any
> advantages...
> 
> Best,
> Matthias
> 
> On 16.12.2016 12:59, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > that server is not available from the internet. But that you get that IP
> > address
> > is enough for me. That didn't happen before.
> > 
> > I will revert that commit and we will see in the testing if this raises any
> > problems again...
> > 
> > Best,
> > -Michael
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 12:47 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 16.12.2016 11:28, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Did you try reverting this one and test if things like
> > > > "pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org" resolve again?
> > > 
> > > I just tested after adding "qname-minimisation: yes" and
> > > "harden-below-nxdomain: yes" to '/etc/unbound/unbound.conf', but neither
> > > "pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org" nor its ip-address "172.28.1.165" answered.
> > > 
> > > No connection through browser, ping loss on both = 100%.
> > > 
> > > With or without, I get the following answer with 'dig':
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > root(a)ipfire: /etc/unbound # dig pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org
> > > 
> > > ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4 <<>> pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org
> > > ;; global options: +cmd
> > > ;; Got answer:
> > > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45016
> > > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> > > 
> > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> > > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> > > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> > > ;pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org.     IN      A
> > > 
> > > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> > > pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org. 293  IN      A       172.28.1.165
> > > 
> > > ;; Query time: 0 msec
> > > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
> > > ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 16 12:33:28 CET 2016
> > > ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 70
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Best,
> > > Matthias
> > > 
> > 
>