Re: forgot to say...

Re: forgot to say...

[Paul Simmons]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2346 bytes --]

On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 10:07 -0700, jim stephens wrote:
> Use teamviewer on a system at each end.  There are other services 
> possibly as well.
> 
> Teamviewer is a desktop share utility.  It has a central server in
> the 
> concept of how
> it works rendering the only needed thing to be a working system to 
> connect in any
> way at each end.
> 
> If you can post email, and SSH from that system to the system with
> the 
> problem
> by IP address, perhaps that would work.
> 
> This jumps the NAT problem.
> 
> Thanks
> Jim
> 
> On 4/5/2017 7:53 AM, Paul Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 10:09 +0100, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > thank you.
> > > 
> > > Can we maybe arrange a session where I log in from remote to your
> > > system and see
> > > what I can find?
> > > 
> > > So far I don't have many ideas.
> > > 
> > > Would this be possible? Where in the world are you even?
> > > 
> > > Best,
> > > -Michael
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 15:35 -0500, Paul Simmons wrote:
> > > > Michael, I forgot to tell you that I'm willing and able to test
> > > > script changes
> > > > (such as the unbound init) or substitute executables on the
> > > > test
> > > > system.
> > > > 
> > > > Thnks,
> > > > Paul
> > 
> > Hello, Michael.
> > 
> > Oh, how I wish!  Unfortunately, I'm NATed and the ISP doesn't allow
> > "local servers".  Also, without working DNS, I'm unsure of how to
> > connect.  I'm in a rural area of West Texas, with "challenging"
> > terrain.  I'm hoping a nearby (~10km distant) fiber provider will
> > build
> > a NLOS WISP in a year or two; they are interested, but not ready to
> > commit.
> > 
> > Perhaps we should take this discussion out of the devel list for
> > now?
> > 
> > I appreciate your attention, and realize you have a lot of others
> > to
> > support.  I notice core110 is in testing.  I'll try some changes
> > locally, based on that release.  I'll poke around in the unbound
> > init.d
> > and get some better info.
> > 
> > I'll report any findings in another thread.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Paul
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Thank you for your reply, Jim.

I think it'll be less effort to work through this myself.

I already have enough complications with my so-called ISP without
adding proprietary software into the mix.

Thank you for the suggestion, though.

Paul

Re: forgot to say...

[Paul Simmons]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]

On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 10:09 +0100, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> thank you.
> 
> Can we maybe arrange a session where I log in from remote to your
> system and see
> what I can find?
> 
> So far I don't have many ideas.
> 
> Would this be possible? Where in the world are you even?
> 
> Best,
> -Michael
> 
> On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 15:35 -0500, Paul Simmons wrote:
> > Michael, I forgot to tell you that I'm willing and able to test
> > script changes
> > (such as the unbound init) or substitute executables on the test
> > system.
> > 
> > Thnks,
> > Paul
> 
> 

Hello, Michael.

Oh, how I wish!  Unfortunately, I'm NATed and the ISP doesn't allow
"local servers".  Also, without working DNS, I'm unsure of how to
connect.  I'm in a rural area of West Texas, with "challenging"
terrain.  I'm hoping a nearby (~10km distant) fiber provider will build
a NLOS WISP in a year or two; they are interested, but not ready to
commit.

Perhaps we should take this discussion out of the devel list for now?

I appreciate your attention, and realize you have a lot of others to
support.  I notice core110 is in testing.  I'll try some changes
locally, based on that release.  I'll poke around in the unbound init.d
and get some better info.

I'll report any findings in another thread.

Best,
Paul