From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter =?utf-8?q?M=C3=BCller?= To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Rejected due to policy violations: Spam detected Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 10:22:08 +0200 Message-ID: <186ddc36-dfb8-ad19-316e-7ac21eb6d5f8@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7576755126366457426==" List-Id: --===============7576755126366457426== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Erik, thanks for your reply. > Hello Peter, >=20 > Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2020, 09:19 +0200 schrieb Peter M=C3=BCller: >> Hello Erik, >> >> thanks for reporting this. > Your welcome. >> >> Unfortunately, sqlite[.]org resolves to >> 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe96:b959, which >> is currently blacklisted for sending spam. Apart from this, your >> mails look >> fine... > Have no URLs somewhere in the mail. Well, rspamd thinks you have. :-) >=20 >> >> May I ask you to simply put brackets between the last dot in the >> link, rendering >> it unusable for machines?=20 > Sure, you mean like this=20 > URL/changes(.)html > (can not post the URL so have shortend it) if so, it does not help > since the same message appears again. No, I meant like: http://www.example[.]com/changes.html >=20 >> I am sorry that this causes trouble again, and it >> is _very_ interesting to see how much other open source projects care >> about >> their IP addresses' reputation. :-/ > Yeah really interesting :-( . Indeed. We are telling IT people they should monitor their IP address' reputa= tions for 20 years by now, and apparently, most of them give a shit on this. Thanks, and best regards, Peter M=C3=BCller --===============7576755126366457426==--