From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Samba update rootfile Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:22:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1EFFD8C2-29D6-4FE2-91A3-1029F4B21668@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3498370311775612869==" List-Id: --===============3498370311775612869== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hallo Adolf, > On 19 Apr 2022, at 11:18, Adolf Belka wrote: >=20 > Hi All, >=20 > I have done an update build of samba-4.16.0 which built fine after the inst= allation of a new dependency perl-JSON. >=20 > My question is regarding the rootfile changes shown in the samba file in th= e log directory. Many of the libraries now have no version number and are rep= laced by just a .so file >=20 > As an example libasn1-samba4 has the following removed > -usr/lib/samba/libasn1-samba4.so.8 > -usr/lib/samba/libasn1-samba4.so.8.0.0 >=20 > and replaced by > +usr/lib/samba/libasn1-samba4.so This is probably not a bad idea from their point of view. Those libraries don= =E2=80=99t need to be versioned, because at a time, you can only have one ver= sion of samba installed. So we need to ship them all. > There is no mention of any changes to the lib files in the Whats New file i= n the source tarball or on the samba website that I have been able to find. >=20 > I want to be sure that this is not occurring because of some error I have m= ade somewhere. >=20 > Attached below is the whole of the samba logfile showing the new files and = the files being removed. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Adolf. >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sent from my laptop > --===============3498370311775612869==--