From: peter.mueller@ipfire.org
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Extremely poor OpenVPN performance, help wanted
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:13:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1efd8fbe-ddbd-65ab-a0c0-2985ec581b43@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBD9E30F-953C-4431-BC4C-F8CCAE3B37EA@rymes.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3207 bytes --]
Hello Tom,
thank you for your reply.
Yes, these VMs are all running on FreeBSD. I will try to test it
with a Debian machine within the next days.
While I am pretty sure MTU is not the (only) root cause of this
problem, setting it to 1492 bytes on the VMs (interface setting
was 1500 bytes) causes a slight improvement to ~ 1.1 MB/sec, which
is still way too low.
Disabling remote packet filters did not change anything, both VMs
and IPFire machine have AES-NI available, thus being able to encrypt
a much bigger volume per second (~ 2.1 Gbit/sec on VMs, ~ 267 Mbit/sec
on IPFire host).
Changing the OpenVPN tunnel MTU to lower values (tested with 1350 and
1300 bytes) did not change anything.
Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller
> Peter,
>
> Is the issue reproducible on different OS and different OpenVPN clients? There’s a chance that the issue lies with FreeBSD or how you are configuring the VMs at different locations.
>
> Tom
>
>> On Sep 24, 2019, at 9:23 AM, <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> as mentioned several times before, I am experiencing OpenVPN performance
>> problems. Since I am out of ideas by now, asking here to help seemed to
>> make sense to me, as I am not sure whether it can be traced to a bug or not.
>>
>> Test setup is as follows:
>> (a) IPFire is freshly installed on a testing machine with Core Update 135 (x86_64).
>> The machine is connected to the internet via DSL (link has 100 Mbit/sec
>> down capacity with MTU set to 1492) and runs dial-in by itself. No
>> cascading router or NAT in place here.
>> (b) The remote part is a VM hosted at a big German hosting company, with
>> FreeBSD 12 installed (OpenVPN 2.4.7). Uplink is 1 Gbit/sec with MTU =
>> 1492.
>> (c) Both systems are able to submit ICMP packets up to 1492 bits, so MTU
>> is set correctly on both interfaces.
>> (d) The VM is establishing an OpenVPN roadwarrior connection to the IPFire
>> machine, which can be set up successfully and uses AES-256-GCM (SHA 512)
>> for data channel. Tunnel MTU is set to 1400 bytes.
>>
>> Downloading a test file via SCP from the VM using the OpenVPN connection
>> takes ages and results in throughput between 400 and 700 kB/sec. While
>> normal ICMP latency through the tunnel is around 35 ms, it fluctuates between
>> 40 and 500 ms while download is running.
>>
>> Needless to say, a bandwidth of 700 kB/sec is unacceptable. Disabling
>> Suricata speeds up to ~ 1.2 MB/sec, disabling Quality of Service (QoS)
>> does not have any big effects.
>>
>> Since there are some clients using OpenVPN in restricted environments,
>> TCP and port 443 is more or less fixed. Switching to UDP causes a small
>> improvement (~ 800 kB/sec), but does not seem to cure the root cause.
>>
>> This effect is reproducible with multiple VMs at multiple locations,
>> so I do not think it is related to network outages at one certain hoster.
>>
>> What am I doing wrong? Is anyone experiencing the same problem?
>>
>> As mentioned in the Subject line, any help is appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks, and best regards,
>> Peter Müller
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 16:22 peter.mueller
2019-09-24 17:04 ` Tom Rymes
2019-09-25 19:13 ` peter.mueller [this message]
2019-09-26 3:21 ` Tom Rymes
2019-10-29 17:41 ` peter.mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1efd8fbe-ddbd-65ab-a0c0-2985ec581b43@ipfire.org \
--to=peter.mueller@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox