From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tapani Tarvainen <ipfire@tapanitarvainen.fi>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Should we block DoH by default?
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:15:50 +0200
Message-ID: <20200303131550.GE31441@tehanu.it.jyu.fi>
In-Reply-To: <83D08EF2-A2BC-4759-9F69-E42BADBDA3C9@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1527180938761546309=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============1527180938761546309==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar 03 11:47, Michael Tremer (michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org) wrote:

> I do not want DoH. I do not like it.=20

I want it and I like it and I think it will come anyway.

> We could consider always blocking this domain and always return NXDOMAIN or=
 something else that falls into the =E2=80=9Cnegative=E2=80=9D category.
>=20
> That way we can guarantee (at least for now) that Firefox users will still =
use the IPFire resolver.
>=20
> Would anybody be against this?

I would. I don't want to be *forced* to use IpFire resolver.

If you something like that, at the very least it should be an option
that can easily be turned off.

--=20
Tapani Tarvainen

--===============1527180938761546309==--