rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)

rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)

[Matthias Fischer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --]

Hi,

after the last drama I hardly dare to ask, but: are we interested in a
'rust 1.67' update, now that the update to 'rust 1.65' is in 'next'?

Changelog:
=>
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1670-2023-01-26

First tests and build (I was curious): only lfs and rootfile updates are
needed.

*duckandcover*... ;-)

Best,
Matthias

Re: rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1049 bytes --]

Hello Matthias,

> On 28 Jan 2023, at 14:37, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> after the last drama I hardly dare to ask, but: are we interested in a
> 'rust 1.67' update, now that the update to 'rust 1.65' is in 'next'?

Generally yes, because we should follow upstream as close as possible when there is such a fast pace from upstream. I am sure there are plenty of bug fixes and security fixes included in this release.

However, with the massive amount of work it takes, I believe that we do not need to jump to every single release. We have other things to take care of after all.

So, if it is an easy jump, feel free to send patches. :)

Thank you for all your effort. I know how much pain packaging Rust is.

All the best,
-Michael

> Changelog:
> =>
> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1670-2023-01-26
> 
> First tests and build (I was curious): only lfs and rootfile updates are
> needed.
> 
> *duckandcover*... ;-)
> 
> Best,
> Matthias

Re: rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)

[Matthias Fischer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1466 bytes --]

Hi,

right now I'm running a second clean build on current 'next'. Just to be
*absolutely* sure that this works.

But: while uploading the sources of 'rust 1.67',  I'm getting "out of
disk space" errors.

Seems that ~1.4GB source code is bit too much for git.ipfire.org ath the
moment, sorry.

Best,
Matthias

On 29.01.2023 15:27, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hello Matthias,
> 
>> On 28 Jan 2023, at 14:37, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> after the last drama I hardly dare to ask, but: are we interested in a
>> 'rust 1.67' update, now that the update to 'rust 1.65' is in 'next'?
> 
> Generally yes, because we should follow upstream as close as possible when there is such a fast pace from upstream. I am sure there are plenty of bug fixes and security fixes included in this release.
> 
> However, with the massive amount of work it takes, I believe that we do not need to jump to every single release. We have other things to take care of after all.
> 
> So, if it is an easy jump, feel free to send patches. :)
> 
> Thank you for all your effort. I know how much pain packaging Rust is.
> 
> All the best,
> -Michael
> 
>> Changelog:
>> =>
>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1670-2023-01-26
>> 
>> First tests and build (I was curious): only lfs and rootfile updates are
>> needed.
>> 
>> *duckandcover*... ;-)
>> 
>> Best,
>> Matthias
> 

Re: rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1780 bytes --]

Hello,

> On 29 Jan 2023, at 18:18, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> right now I'm running a second clean build on current 'next'. Just to be
> *absolutely* sure that this works.

Great!

> But: while uploading the sources of 'rust 1.67',  I'm getting "out of
> disk space" errors.
> 
> Seems that ~1.4GB source code is bit too much for git.ipfire.org ath the
> moment, sorry.

Yes, the partition for the source ran out of space.

I increased the size, but 1.4G per release seems to be very excessive…

-Michael

> Best,
> Matthias
> 
> On 29.01.2023 15:27, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> Hello Matthias,
>> 
>>> On 28 Jan 2023, at 14:37, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> after the last drama I hardly dare to ask, but: are we interested in a
>>> 'rust 1.67' update, now that the update to 'rust 1.65' is in 'next'?
>> 
>> Generally yes, because we should follow upstream as close as possible when there is such a fast pace from upstream. I am sure there are plenty of bug fixes and security fixes included in this release.
>> 
>> However, with the massive amount of work it takes, I believe that we do not need to jump to every single release. We have other things to take care of after all.
>> 
>> So, if it is an easy jump, feel free to send patches. :)
>> 
>> Thank you for all your effort. I know how much pain packaging Rust is.
>> 
>> All the best,
>> -Michael
>> 
>>> Changelog:
>>> =>
>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1670-2023-01-26
>>> 
>>> First tests and build (I was curious): only lfs and rootfile updates are
>>> needed.
>>> 
>>> *duckandcover*... ;-)
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>> 
> 

Re: rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)

[Matthias Fischer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2131 bytes --]

Hi,

On 29.01.2023 21:57, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>> On 29 Jan 2023, at 18:18, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> right now I'm running a second clean build on current 'next'. Just to be
>> *absolutely* sure that this works.
> 
> Great!

Second build ran through without errors.

>> But: while uploading the sources of 'rust 1.67',  I'm getting "out of
>> disk space" errors.
>> 
>> Seems that ~1.4GB source code is bit too much for git.ipfire.org ath the
>> moment, sorry.
> 
> Yes, the partition for the source ran out of space.
> 
> I increased the size, but 1.4G per release seems to be very excessive…

Yep. I was a bit puzzled, too.

1.65: 1.3GB, 1.67: 1.4GB - where will this end up when 2.0 comes out!?
Estimated: ~4.7GB!? ;-)

I'm ready to push - shall I?

Best,
Matthias

> -Michael
> 
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>> 
>> On 29.01.2023 15:27, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>> Hello Matthias,
>>> 
>>>> On 28 Jan 2023, at 14:37, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> after the last drama I hardly dare to ask, but: are we interested in a
>>>> 'rust 1.67' update, now that the update to 'rust 1.65' is in 'next'?
>>> 
>>> Generally yes, because we should follow upstream as close as possible when there is such a fast pace from upstream. I am sure there are plenty of bug fixes and security fixes included in this release.
>>> 
>>> However, with the massive amount of work it takes, I believe that we do not need to jump to every single release. We have other things to take care of after all.
>>> 
>>> So, if it is an easy jump, feel free to send patches. :)
>>> 
>>> Thank you for all your effort. I know how much pain packaging Rust is.
>>> 
>>> All the best,
>>> -Michael
>>> 
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> =>
>>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1670-2023-01-26
>>>> 
>>>> First tests and build (I was curious): only lfs and rootfile updates are
>>>> needed.
>>>> 
>>>> *duckandcover*... ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Matthias
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2357 bytes --]

Hello,

> On 30 Jan 2023, at 18:48, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 29.01.2023 21:57, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>>> On 29 Jan 2023, at 18:18, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> right now I'm running a second clean build on current 'next'. Just to be
>>> *absolutely* sure that this works.
>> 
>> Great!
> 
> Second build ran through without errors.
> 
>>> But: while uploading the sources of 'rust 1.67',  I'm getting "out of
>>> disk space" errors.
>>> 
>>> Seems that ~1.4GB source code is bit too much for git.ipfire.org ath the
>>> moment, sorry.
>> 
>> Yes, the partition for the source ran out of space.
>> 
>> I increased the size, but 1.4G per release seems to be very excessive…
> 
> Yep. I was a bit puzzled, too.
> 
> 1.65: 1.3GB, 1.67: 1.4GB - where will this end up when 2.0 comes out!?
> Estimated: ~4.7GB!? ;-)
> 
> I'm ready to push - shall I?

Yes, please.

-Michael

> 
> Best,
> Matthias
> 
>> -Michael
>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>>> 
>>> On 29.01.2023 15:27, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>>> Hello Matthias,
>>>> 
>>>>> On 28 Jan 2023, at 14:37, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> after the last drama I hardly dare to ask, but: are we interested in a
>>>>> 'rust 1.67' update, now that the update to 'rust 1.65' is in 'next'?
>>>> 
>>>> Generally yes, because we should follow upstream as close as possible when there is such a fast pace from upstream. I am sure there are plenty of bug fixes and security fixes included in this release.
>>>> 
>>>> However, with the massive amount of work it takes, I believe that we do not need to jump to every single release. We have other things to take care of after all.
>>>> 
>>>> So, if it is an easy jump, feel free to send patches. :)
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for all your effort. I know how much pain packaging Rust is.
>>>> 
>>>> All the best,
>>>> -Michael
>>>> 
>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>> =>
>>>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1670-2023-01-26
>>>>> 
>>>>> First tests and build (I was curious): only lfs and rootfile updates are
>>>>> needed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> *duckandcover*... ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Matthias
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>