From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Removal of client175
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 13:28:51 +0100
Message-ID: <23C10F30-9E0F-4C6C-87B0-1E94997CCE2F@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <8728c93b-f7e0-43a4-6351-efb74787165c@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5382407210958513737=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============5382407210958513737==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Adolf,

> On 6 Oct 2021, at 15:32, Adolf Belka <adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hi All,
>=20
> I am getting ready to create the patch for the removal of client175.


Thank you for taking care of this.

> However it is not clear to me what the relationship is between client175 an=
d mpfire/mpd/mpc. Can mpfire/mpd/mpc work and be used without client175 being=
 present or are they linked, in which case presumably they should also be rem=
oved then?

mpd/mpc are standalone and client175 is just a WUI for them. Technically they=
 can stay.

If we want them to stay is another question, but for the time being I would s=
ay yes.

-Michael

>=20
> Thanks for your advice.
>=20
> Adolf.
>=20


--===============5382407210958513737==--