Hello, visudo launching nano would really surprise me :) -Michael > On 11 Oct 2021, at 21:57, Adolf Belka wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > On 11/10/2021 18:14, Jon Murphy wrote: >> Vim as default is fine! >> >> The only default editor setting I know of is in fcron. >> >> # Location of the default editor for "fcrontab -e" >> #editor = /usr/bin/vi >> editor = /usr/bin/nano >> Is there another? >> > If you want to edit the sudoers file you have to use the visudo command which by default uses vi. > > You can use nano with visudo by running > > # EDITOR=nano visudo > > and to change the editor permanently add the following into the sudoers file. > > # Reset environment by default > Defaults env_reset > # Set default EDITOR to nano, and do not allow visudo to use EDITOR/VISUAL. > Defaults editor=/usr/bin/nano, !env_editor > > Regards, > > Adolf. > >> >> >>> On Oct 11, 2021, at 8:07 AM, Michael Tremer wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>>> On 10 Oct 2021, at 20:42, Jon Murphy wrote: >>>> >>>> I’m not sure nano is "the" answer though I do like it. Just anything besides vim. >>>> >>>> Vim is fine for developers. It is the non-developers that struggle. This article explains it pretty well and it includes my struggles to exit! >>>> >>>> https://stackoverflow.blog/2017/05/23/stack-overflow-helping-one-million-developers-exit-vim/ >>>> >>>> Q: How do you generate a random string? >>>> A: Put a user in front of vi, and tell them to exit >>> >>> LOL. Good one. >>> >>> I wouldn’t be against adding nano to the core distribution, although I would draw the line there and say that Joe is then out :) >>> >>> However, I wouldn’t want to make it the default editor if that is okay. >>> >>> -Michael >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 10, 2021, at 7:55 AM, Michael Tremer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> We have (or had) a couple of editors and I am quite against shipping them all. >>>>> >>>>> Everyone has their favourites, and there will always be another one. >>>>> >>>>> What is wrong with vim? >>>>> >>>>> -Michael >>>>> >>>>>> On 9 Oct 2021, at 22:07, Jon Murphy wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> All, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it possible to move `nano` from addon to core? It is SOOOOO much easier to use than vim. >>>>>> >>>>>> I understand it is an easy installed addon but it seems like it really belongs in "core". >>>>>> >>>>>> Jon >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 9, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Adolf Belka wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Adolf Belka >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 08/10/2021 19:22, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>>>>>>> For details see: >>>>>>>> https://www.nano-editor.org/news.php >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fischer >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> lfs/nano | 6 +++--- >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/lfs/nano b/lfs/nano >>>>>>>> index 3bb7806aa..237dfab20 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/lfs/nano >>>>>>>> +++ b/lfs/nano >>>>>>>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ >>>>>>>> include Config >>>>>>>> -VER = 5.8 >>>>>>>> +VER = 5.9 >>>>>>>> THISAPP = nano-$(VER) >>>>>>>> DL_FILE = $(THISAPP).tar.xz >>>>>>>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ DL_FROM = $(URL_IPFIRE) >>>>>>>> DIR_APP = $(DIR_SRC)/$(THISAPP) >>>>>>>> TARGET = $(DIR_INFO)/$(THISAPP) >>>>>>>> PROG = nano >>>>>>>> -PAK_VER = 38 >>>>>>>> +PAK_VER = 39 >>>>>>>> DEPS = "" >>>>>>>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ objects = $(DL_FILE) >>>>>>>> $(DL_FILE) = $(DL_FROM)/$(DL_FILE) >>>>>>>> -$(DL_FILE)_MD5 = d2249e3dd108c830df00efd7c1b79d86 >>>>>>>> +$(DL_FILE)_MD5 = 24b67a7a2e731d3a5ec6d154b4521d08 >>>>>>>> install : $(TARGET) >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>