From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Fischer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Logwatch (randomly) skipping days => Feature!? Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:01:37 +0100 Message-ID: <292383e9-7c6e-5071-b56d-cf0479bd75ba@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: <69823681-C00C-4FF2-8D6E-22F88ED93664@rymes.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0395484513064354700==" List-Id: --===============0395484513064354700== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 17.02.2019 15:42, Tom Rymes wrote: > Is this a ticking issue where one log has two days=E2=80=99 data and the ot= her is empty? [Correction: Of course I meant '.../2019-01-26' ;-) ] Looking an it - could be the case. The log created on 2019-01-28 is significantly bigger: ***SNIP*** ... -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43698 Jan 24 00:01 2019-01-23 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 56469 Jan 25 00:01 2019-01-24 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 57936 Jan 26 00:01 2019-01-25 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jan 27 00:01 2019-01-26 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 114650 Jan 28 00:01 2019-01-27 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40121 Jan 29 00:01 2019-01-28 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 38220 Jan 30 00:01 2019-01-29 ... ***SNAP*** But what can I do about this? For now, I changed running time to "03 0 * * *". Best, Matthias >> On Feb 17, 2019, at 4:22 AM, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I discovered something weird: >>=20 >> From time to time 'logwatch' does not create a daily log. >>=20 >> E.g.: >> The file '/var/log/logwatch/2019-14-26' exists, but size =3D 0 Bytes. >>=20 >> The same happened yesterday with '/var/log/logwatch/2019-02-16': >> 0 Bytes. >>=20 >> After running... >>=20 >> /usr/local/bin/logwatch > /var/log/logwatch/`date -I -d yesterday`; \ >> LOGWATCH_KEEP=3D$(sed -ne 's/^LOGWATCH_KEEP=3D\([0-9]\+\)$/\1/p' >> /var/ipfire/logging/settings); \ >> find /var/log/logwatch/ -ctime +${LOGWATCH_KEEP=3D56} -exec rm -f '{}' ';' >>=20 >> ...manually from console, file was created, everything looks ok. >>=20 >> 1. Can anyone confirm? >>=20 >> 2. With which parameter could I change the starting time "01 0 * * *" so >> that this doesn't happen again? I'm searching, but can't find a grip on >> this... >>=20 >> Best, >> Matthias >=20 --===============0395484513064354700==--