From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Error message being shown from IPFire2.x build
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:51:12 +0000
Message-ID: <2D2A57AE-A89F-411D-9FDA-8B64919A05CC@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <E3B6CA4F-6CA6-4781-BD91-3B2193DBAE9C@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8110680142214097200=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============8110680142214097200==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I rewrote the script:

  https://git.ipfire.org/?p=3Dipfire-2.x.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D9820735b9ecc0=
e442d99a58b96e4309da4edeff6

Please let me know if that fixes the problem.

-Michael

> On 15 Mar 2024, at 10:28, Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org> wrot=
e:
>=20
> Hello Adolf,
>=20
> Yes, this is a false positive lol.
>=20
> I will have a look and silence this.
>=20
> -Michael
>=20
>> On 14 Mar 2024, at 16:27, Adolf Belka <adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> Hi All,
>>=20
>> Seems that the code that is checking if an architecture has been used in a=
 rootfile is also looking at the Core Update update.sh file.
>>=20
>>=20
>> I just got this error message.
>>=20
>> Error! 'aarch64' in rootfiles files found!
>> ./config/rootfiles/core/185/update.sh:    aarch64)
>> Replace by xxxMACHINExxx !
>>=20
>> The aarch64 use in update.sh makes sense as it is a command to only be run=
 for aarch64 and not at all for x86_64.
>>=20
>> It is not a big problem and can be ignored in this case but the check code=
 probably should only look in the common and the packages rootfile directorie=
s and sub-directories.
>>=20
>>=20
>> Regards,
>>=20
>> Adolf
>>=20
>=20


--===============8110680142214097200==--