From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Adolf Belka (ipfire-dev)" To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Fireperf: first tests an results Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:34:39 +0100 Message-ID: <2a9a4e32-3a68-7f21-0db2-2bd58c9ef09f@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8908133721455203636==" List-Id: --===============8908133721455203636== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Forgot to add that I built it on my Arch Linux system with the following comm= ands:- ./autogen.sh /configure CFLAGS=3D'-g -O0' --prefix=3D/usr --sysconfdir=3D/etc --libdir=3D/= usr/lib (This was recommended to be used after autogen was run) make sudo make install Regards, Adolf. On 12/02/2021 13:30, Adolf Belka (ipfire-dev) wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to also test this out on my system. > > As I am not familiar with what all the command options do I just followed D= aniels commands. > > server: IPFire 2.25 - Core Update 153; Intel Celeron CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz x4= ; I211 Gigabit Network Connection > > client: Arch Linux; Intel Core i5-8400 CPU @ 2.80GHz 6 core; 1GBit nic > > Server: > fireperf -s -P 10000 -p 63000:630010 > > > Client: > fireperf -c -P 1 -x -p 63000:63010 where was repl= aced with the IP address of my IPFire Green connection. > > > I started the server fireperf and there was the table updating regularly. > > I started the client and got "Could not open socket: Address family not sup= ported by protocol" scrolling up the screen. > > I looked in the log (journalctl) but there were no messages at all related = to fireperf just the command being run. > > > Any thoughts on what I am missing to have setup or installed? > > > Regards, > > Adolf. > > > > On 09/02/2021 13:53, daniel.weismueller(a)ipfire.org wrote: >> >> >> Hi guys, >> >> today I installed fireperf on my testing IPFire and my Ubuntu PC. >> >> server: IPFire Core 154; Intel i7 4790; Intel 82571EB/GB 1GBit Nic >> Client: Ubuntu 20.4; Intel i7 9700; Intel i219-V 1GBit Nic >> >> Michael and I agreed that one more port should be opened per 5000 expected= connection per second (cps) >> >> So here my results: >> >> >> Server: >> fireperf -s -P 10000 -p 63000:630010 >> >> Client: >> fireperf -c -P 1 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~5000 cps >> >> fireperf -c -P 10 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~30000-35000 cps >> >> fireperf -c -P 100 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~35000-40000 cps >> >> fireperf -c -P 1000 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~40000-45000 cps >> >> fireperf -c -P 10000 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~46000-48000 cps >> >> The cpu utilization was limited to one core and increased in sync with the= cps on both sides. >> >> In my last test, the utilization was about 85-100% on the server and 75-95= % on the client. >> >> In the next days I will test our mini and post the results here. >> >> - >> >> Daniel >> --===============8908133721455203636==--