From: "Peter Müller" <peter.mueller@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Nano: Move nano editor from packages to core system
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:06:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cd3278b-bbee-c1fd-5790-4732cc12fe2f@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1851154E-3D7A-4E87-B3DF-7BFFD339D49A@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2980 bytes --]
Hello *,
I just merged this patch into next, but since it was generated manually, I had to do
the changes introduced by it myself manually.
> Hello,
>
> I personally do not count nano as an editor. There are so many things wrong with it :)
>
> But if everyone wants this, I do not think that shipping ~444 KB of code will break the camel’s back.
Certainly not.
>
> Acked-by: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>
>
> -Michael
>
> P.S. @Peter: Would you please make sure that pakfire drops the metadata of the package?
Yes.
Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller
>
>> On 21 Mar 2022, at 17:49, Adolf Belka <adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On 21/03/2022 17:22, Peter Müller wrote:
>>> Hello *,
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> How is everybody feeling about this?
>>> I understand the motivation behind this. In my early days, I completely lacked any vim
>>> skills, and found it pretty stressing to bring things back up after a crash while at the
>>> same time frantically thinking "how to %&§#$ deal with this text editor?!".
>>>
>>>> How many nano users do we have here?
>> I am definitely one. I also use nano for working on my Arch Linux systems and adjust the default editor for things like visudo so it uses nano.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Adolf.
>>> Back then, nano would have helped me. Today, I am used to vim and would not experience
>>> any benefit from nano being around on IPFire as well.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, I vote in favour of this patch, for reasons mentioned above.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org>
>>>
>>> Thanks, and best regards,
>>> Peter Müller
>>>
>>>> -Michael
>>>>
>>>>> On 17 Mar 2022, at 17:06, Jon Murphy <jon.murphy(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> - this will not change the default editor `vim`
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Murphy <jon.murphy(a)ipfire.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> config/rootfiles/{packages => common}/nano | 0
>>>>> lfs/nano | 7 +++----
>>>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>> rename config/rootfiles/{packages => common}/nano (100%)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/config/rootfiles/packages/nano b/config/rootfiles/common/nano
>>>>> similarity index 100%
>>>>> rename from config/rootfiles/packages/nano
>>>>> rename to config/rootfiles/common/nano
>>>>> diff --git a/lfs/nano b/lfs/nano
>>>>> index df994364f..85be014ee 100644
>>>>> --- a/lfs/nano
>>>>> +++ b/lfs/nano
>>>>> @@ -32,12 +32,11 @@ DL_FILE = $(THISAPP).tar.xz
>>>>> DL_FROM = $(URL_IPFIRE)
>>>>> DIR_APP = $(DIR_SRC)/$(THISAPP)
>>>>> TARGET = $(DIR_INFO)/$(THISAPP)
>>>>> -PROG = nano
>>>>> -PAK_VER = 41
>>>>>
>>>>> -DEPS = ""
>>>>>
>>>>> -SERVICES =
>>>>>
>>>>> ###############################################################################
>>>>> # Top-level Rules
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.30.2
>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my laptop
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 17:06 Jon Murphy
2022-03-21 16:09 ` Michael Tremer
2022-03-21 16:22 ` Peter Müller
2022-03-21 17:49 ` Adolf Belka
2022-03-21 18:52 ` Michael Tremer
2022-03-21 19:06 ` Peter Müller [this message]
2022-03-21 21:20 ` Jon Murphy
2022-03-24 9:52 ` Peter Müller
2022-03-21 17:15 ` Matthias Fischer
2022-03-21 18:55 ` Tom Rymes
2022-03-22 1:01 ` Paul Simmons
2022-03-22 10:49 ` Michael Tremer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cd3278b-bbee-c1fd-5790-4732cc12fe2f@ipfire.org \
--to=peter.mueller@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox