From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter =?utf-8?q?M=C3=BCller?= <peter.mueller@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Nano: Move nano editor from packages to core system
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:06:31 +0000
Message-ID: <2cd3278b-bbee-c1fd-5790-4732cc12fe2f@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <1851154E-3D7A-4E87-B3DF-7BFFD339D49A@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7555331691857647279=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============7555331691857647279==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello *,

I just merged this patch into next, but since it was generated manually, I ha=
d to do
the changes introduced by it myself manually.

> Hello,
>=20
> I personally do not count nano as an editor. There are so many things wrong=
 with it :)
>=20
> But if everyone wants this, I do not think that shipping ~444 KB of code wi=
ll break the camel=E2=80=99s back.

Certainly not.

>=20
> Acked-by: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>
>=20
> -Michael
>=20
> P.S. @Peter: Would you please make sure that pakfire drops the metadata of =
the package?

Yes.

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter M=C3=BCller

>=20
>> On 21 Mar 2022, at 17:49, Adolf Belka <adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On 21/03/2022 17:22, Peter M=C3=BCller wrote:
>>> Hello *,
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> How is everybody feeling about this?
>>> I understand the motivation behind this. In my early days, I completely l=
acked any vim
>>> skills, and found it pretty stressing to bring things back up after a cra=
sh while at the
>>> same time frantically thinking "how to %&=C2=A7#$ deal with this text edi=
tor?!".
>>>
>>>> How many nano users do we have here?
>> I am definitely one. I also use nano for working on my Arch Linux systems =
and adjust the default editor for things like visudo so it uses nano.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Adolf.
>>> Back then, nano would have helped me. Today, I am used to vim and would n=
ot experience
>>> any benefit from nano being around on IPFire as well.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, I vote in favour of this patch, for reasons mentioned above.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Peter M=C3=BCller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org>
>>>
>>> Thanks, and best regards,
>>> Peter M=C3=BCller
>>>
>>>> -Michael
>>>>
>>>>> On 17 Mar 2022, at 17:06, Jon Murphy <jon.murphy(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> - this will not change the default editor `vim`
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Murphy <jon.murphy(a)ipfire.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> config/rootfiles/{packages =3D> common}/nano | 0
>>>>> lfs/nano                                   | 7 +++----
>>>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>> rename config/rootfiles/{packages =3D> common}/nano (100%)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/config/rootfiles/packages/nano b/config/rootfiles/common/n=
ano
>>>>> similarity index 100%
>>>>> rename from config/rootfiles/packages/nano
>>>>> rename to config/rootfiles/common/nano
>>>>> diff --git a/lfs/nano b/lfs/nano
>>>>> index df994364f..85be014ee 100644
>>>>> --- a/lfs/nano
>>>>> +++ b/lfs/nano
>>>>> @@ -32,12 +32,11 @@ DL_FILE    =3D $(THISAPP).tar.xz
>>>>> DL_FROM    =3D $(URL_IPFIRE)
>>>>> DIR_APP    =3D $(DIR_SRC)/$(THISAPP)
>>>>> TARGET     =3D $(DIR_INFO)/$(THISAPP)
>>>>> -PROG       =3D nano
>>>>> -PAK_VER    =3D 41
>>>>>
>>>>> -DEPS       =3D ""
>>>>>
>>>>> -SERVICES   =3D
>>>>>
>>>>> #######################################################################=
########
>>>>> # Top-level Rules
>>>>> --=20
>>>>> 2.30.2
>>>>>
>>
>> --=20
>> Sent from my laptop
>=20

--===============7555331691857647279==--