Hi,

On 20.09.2017 23:22, Michael Tremer wrote:

> it would be way better to have the link in the CGI and not in the
> translation file. That way translators wouldn't have to deal with any
> of the markup and what is even worse: being able to inject any kind of
> HTML into the generated output. But that is a different issue.

Yep. Why did I know that you would answer that...? ;-))

> Would you be up for sending a corrected patch?

No problem - I'll try, but the first attempts ended in a blank page.

I tried to add these links like in 'wlanap.cgi' (lines 536ff) but hadn't
so far no luck, only a white "server error" page. I'll try again.

> I like the idea to get a reference so people find the correct
> configuration page easily.

Me, too - and the easiest way I remembered was the way we did this in
Copfilter. However not the best way.

Best,
Matthias