public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter Müller" <peter.mueller@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Core Update 164 (testing) report
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:43:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31401956-2d4f-a4b6-ee91-dbc62bc93d14@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc9abe5a-8e31-d857-e5bd-191eb63e158b@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1690 bytes --]

Hello development folks,

Core Update 164 (testing; see: https://blog.ipfire.org/post/ipfire-2-27-core-update-164-is-available-for-testing)
is running here for about three days by now without any major issues known so far.

While the updated kernel should fix XHCI issues affecting a relatively small fraction
of our userbase pretty badly (see #12750), I was unable to confirm it does, as I do
not have physical access to the only board affected in my environment. Also, I am not
aware of any community feedback on this, too. Let's hope we'll hear about this soon...

Although not mentioned in the testing announcement due to ${reasons}, this update
contains the "multiple IPS ruleset providers" by Stefan, also working fine. Thanks for
that, too!

While the DROP_HOSTILE stuff works well and I have not yet read any complaint about it,
there is a decent amount of apparently legitimate packets being logged (and subsequently)
dropped as conntrack INVALIDs. Other users notice this as well.

I do not really see this as an issue: We now _know_ conntrack is dropping substantially
more packets than we expected it to do, and can investigate on why it does this. Yay.

Tested IPFire functionalities in detail:
- PPPoE dial-up via a DSL connection
- IPsec (N2N connections only)
- Squid (authentication enabled, using an upstream proxy)
- OpenVPN (RW connections only)
- IPS/Suricata (with Emerging Threats community ruleset enabled)
- Guardian
- Quality of Service
- DNS (using DNS over TLS and strict QNAME minimisation)
- Dynamic DNS
- Tor (relay mode)

I am looking forward to the release of Core Update 164.

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-23 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <164537850759.17885.12515633604045912133.ipfire@ipfire.org>
2022-02-21 15:01 ` IPFire 2.27 - Core Update 164 is available for testing Adolf Belka
2022-02-21 15:08   ` Adolf Belka
2022-02-21 15:28     ` Adolf Belka
2022-02-21 17:44       ` Jon Murphy
2022-02-21 18:03         ` Adolf Belka
2022-02-23 20:43   ` Peter Müller [this message]
2024-05-18 16:11   ` Core Update 186 (testing) report Peter Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31401956-2d4f-a4b6-ee91-dbc62bc93d14@ipfire.org \
    --to=peter.mueller@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox