Okay. Will you update the patch accordingly, please? -Michael > On 8 Mar 2020, at 13:15, Peter Müller wrote: > > Hello Michael, > >> Hi, >> >> I appreciate the thought, but I think the implementation might be very confusing. >> >> I think the patch could be improved by: >> >> * Removing the 220 number and simply call it “IPsec VPN Routing Table” > > Okay, good point. > >> >> * Not show the box when the table is empty which it will be for all users that are not using IPsec > > ACK. > >> >> And since it is basically a static table, I do not see what there is to gain for the user from this. How can this help with debugging? > > For the same reasons we display contents of the routing table, I guess. The user is > able to do quick plausibility checks over it, without digging/using the search > engine of his/hers least distrust for the command that shows him the IPsec routing information. > > Thanks, and best regards, > Peter Müller > >> >> -Michael >> >>> On 7 Mar 2020, at 18:46, Peter Müller wrote: >>> >>> Since IPsec routing information do not show up in the normal routing >>> table, also displaying the contents of table 220 on netother.cgi might >>> be useful for debugging purposes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Müller >>> --- >>> html/cgi-bin/netother.cgi | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/html/cgi-bin/netother.cgi b/html/cgi-bin/netother.cgi >>> index dde1b603a..ac02b8148 100644 >>> --- a/html/cgi-bin/netother.cgi >>> +++ b/html/cgi-bin/netother.cgi >>> @@ -79,6 +79,12 @@ if ( $querry[0] =~ "fwhits"){ >>> print "
$output
\n"; >>> &Header::closebox(); >>> >>> + &Header::openbox('100%', 'left', "$Lang::tr{'routing table entries'} 220"); >>> + $output = `/sbin/ip route list table 220`; >>> + $output = &Header::cleanhtml($output,"y"); >>> + print "
$output
\n"; >>> + &Header::closebox() >>> + >>> &Header::openbox('100%', 'left', $Lang::tr{'arp table entries'}); >>> $output = `/sbin/ip neigh show`; >>> $output = &Header::cleanhtml($output,"y"); >>> -- >>> 2.16.4 >>