Re: Rejected due to policy violations: Spam detected

[ummeegge <ummeegge@ipfire.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1475 bytes --]

Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2020, 10:22 +0200 schrieb Peter Müller:
> Hello Erik,
> 
> thanks for your reply.
> 
> > Hello Peter,
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2020, 09:19 +0200 schrieb Peter Müller:
> > > Hello Erik,
> > > 
> > > thanks for reporting this.
> > 
> > Your welcome.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, sqlite[.]org resolves to
> > > 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe96:b959, which
> > > is currently blacklisted for sending spam. Apart from this, your
> > > mails look
> > > fine...
> > 
> > Have no URLs somewhere in the mail.
> 
> Well, rspamd thinks you have. :-)
Really, which one is this 8-) ?

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > May I ask you to simply put brackets between the last dot in the
> > > link, rendering
> > > it unusable for machines? 
> > 
> > Sure, you mean like this 
> > URL/changes(.)html
> > (can not post the URL so have shortend it) if so, it does not help
> > since the same message appears again.
> 
> No, I meant like: http://www.example[.]com/changes.html
OK, got it. Thanks.

> 
> > 
> > > I am sorry that this causes trouble again, and it
> > > is _very_ interesting to see how much other open source projects
> > > care
> > > about
> > > their IP addresses' reputation. :-/
> > 
> > Yeah really interesting :-( .
> 
> Indeed. We are telling IT people they should monitor their IP
> address' reputations
> for 20 years by now, and apparently, most of them give a shit on
> this.
Yes, sad but true.

> 
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller

Best,

Erik