From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ummeegge To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Rejected due to policy violations: Spam detected Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 10:50:57 +0200 Message-ID: <37c31ec5d486c517f1ea997817f258278d8785f1.camel@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: <186ddc36-dfb8-ad19-316e-7ac21eb6d5f8@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6083008438246446438==" List-Id: --===============6083008438246446438== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2020, 10:22 +0200 schrieb Peter Müller: > Hello Erik, > > thanks for your reply. > > > Hello Peter, > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2020, 09:19 +0200 schrieb Peter Müller: > > > Hello Erik, > > > > > > thanks for reporting this. > > > > Your welcome. > > > > > > Unfortunately, sqlite[.]org resolves to > > > 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe96:b959, which > > > is currently blacklisted for sending spam. Apart from this, your > > > mails look > > > fine... > > > > Have no URLs somewhere in the mail. > > Well, rspamd thinks you have. :-) Really, which one is this 8-) ? > > > > > > > > > May I ask you to simply put brackets between the last dot in the > > > link, rendering > > > it unusable for machines? > > > > Sure, you mean like this > > URL/changes(.)html > > (can not post the URL so have shortend it) if so, it does not help > > since the same message appears again. > > No, I meant like: http://www.example[.]com/changes.html OK, got it. Thanks. > > > > > > I am sorry that this causes trouble again, and it > > > is _very_ interesting to see how much other open source projects > > > care > > > about > > > their IP addresses' reputation. :-/ > > > > Yeah really interesting :-( . > > Indeed. We are telling IT people they should monitor their IP > address' reputations > for 20 years by now, and apparently, most of them give a shit on > this. Yes, sad but true. > > Thanks, and best regards, > Peter Müller Best, Erik --===============6083008438246446438==--