From: Adolf Belka <adolf.belka@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on drop-hostile graph changes for bug#12981
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 18:08:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e98e120-8dae-49db-9da6-56801ea60e9e@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6c83063-2a1a-4882-8d84-e1455c933563@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3389 bytes --]
Hi Michael,
On 10/02/2024 15:22, Adolf Belka wrote:
> Hi Jon and Michael,
>
> On 10/02/2024 15:09, jon wrote:
>> Keep in mind there is a fcron for old RRDs (over 1 year old):
>>
>> # Cleanup the collectd RRD (graphs)
>> %weekly * * /bin/find /var/log/rrd -mtime +365 -type f -name '*.rrd' -delete -o -type d -empty -delete
> The problem here is that we are changing the Hostile data from DROP_HOSTILE into DROP_HOSTILE_IN & DROP_HOSTILE_OUT but we want to keep the history of DROP_HOSTILE and in a fresh install it is only creating the DROP_HOSTILE_IN and DROP_HOSTILE_OUT directories and the graph is also looking if there is any data historically from the DROP_HOSTILE data.
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2024, at 7:14 AM, Adolf Belka <adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org <mailto:adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Sorry for delay in feedback.
>>>
>>> I tried out the drop-hostile changes with both an update from CU182 to CU184 and a fresh install of CU184 and had an error message showing with the graph in both cases.
>>>
>>> When I did the update from CU182 to CU184 the error message
>>>
>>> /var/log/rrd/collectd/localhost/iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP_IN/ipt_bytes-DROP_HOSTILE.rrd
>>>
>>> was not present.
>>>
>>> See the screenshot attachment.
>>>
>>> Checking the directories there was only the iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP directory and not the iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP_IN or iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP_OUT directories.
>>>
>>> Maybe something needs to be done in the update.sh script to create the new directories. I am not sure what though.
>>>
>>>
>>> When I did a fresh install from CU184 it was the other way round.
>>>
>>> /var/log/rrd/collectd/localhost/iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP/ipt_bytes-DROP_HOSTILE.rrd
>>>
>>> was not present.
>>>
>>> Checking the directories there were the iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP_IN and iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP_OUT directories but not the iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP directory.
>>>
>>> For a fresh install then there will be no history with the old naming so here I would think we need to create the old directory name as standard for everyone but it will just not have any data. If the user does a restore of an old backup then that HOSTILE_DROP data would become available.
>
> I think I might have found out what has caused this. In my original patch set I changed collectd.conf to only chain the filters for the IN and OUT and I removed the Chain filter HOSTILE_DROP DROP_HOSTILE entry in the plugin iptables section.
>
> As we are continuing to use the HOSTILE_DROP for the history I have added that old line back into collectd.conf and am running a build and will test out that fresh install to see if it solves the problem for that particular issue.
>
Looks like I don't understand the whole collectd/rrd/graphs thing enough.
Adding that line back into the collectd.conf file did not cause the iptables-filter-HOSTILE_DROP directory to be created.
I have looked through all the code changes done and I can't understand why this is occurring let alone how to fix it.
Regards,
Adolf.
> Regards,
> Adolf.
>>>
>>>
>>> On the fresh install of CU148 I did a restore of a backup from CU182 and then the graph worked as all three directories then were present.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Adolf.
>>> <firewall hits graph core update.png>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-10 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E6A1F37D-E967-457D-8E15-BFBAC51F4088@ipfire.org>
2024-02-10 14:22 ` Adolf Belka
2024-02-10 17:08 ` Adolf Belka [this message]
2024-02-10 17:42 ` Adolf Belka
2024-02-10 18:11 ` Adolf Belka
2024-02-11 13:12 ` Adolf Belka
2024-02-13 17:45 ` Adolf Belka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e98e120-8dae-49db-9da6-56801ea60e9e@ipfire.org \
--to=adolf.belka@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox